| Author | Message | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3388 Registered: 5-2003 |
The law was changed, but they ignored it despite the danger. | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 2505 Registered: 4-2010 |
Law = regulation? Governmental law? Military law? Law of physics? They = HAM? HAF? HA-Mixed? Was the "danger" life-threatening? "It" = the changed law? The original law? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3392 Registered: 5-2003 |
Law = regulation? This. Governmental law? Military law? Thisish. Law of physics? They = HAM? HAF? HA-Mixed? This. Was the "danger" life-threatening? Yope. "It" = the changed law? This. The original law? | ||
| Galfisk (Galfisk)
New member Username: Galfisk Post Number: 2713 Registered: 9-2009 |
Was the danger from the consequences of the law itself (ie "If you break the law, you'll be arrested/beaten/shot"), or was the law changed to keep people out of danger? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3394 Registered: 5-2003 |
Was the danger from the consequences of the law itself (ie "If you break the law, you'll be arrested/beaten/shot") This, or was the law changed to keep people out of danger? Though yopish to this as well. | ||
| Galfisk (Galfisk)
New member Username: Galfisk Post Number: 2728 Registered: 9-2009 |
Is their reason for ignoring it relevant? If so, did they keep doing things the old way? Are they in a war? Were they caught? Disciplined? Killed? Did they think the new law was stupid? Or irrelevant? Or did they not know about it? did this happen in the last: decade? Century? Is it a true story? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3397 Registered: 5-2003 |
Is their reason for ignoring it relevant? Yes. If so, did they keep doing things the old way? Yes. Are they in a war? Yes. Were they caught? Disciplined? Possibly to both. Killed? No. Did they think the new law was stupid? No. Or irrelevant? No. Or did they not know about it? No. did this happen in the last: decade? Century? This. Is it a true story? Yes. | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 2548 Registered: 4-2010 |
Is this in WWI? WWII? Korean? Vietnam? Gulf War? Any of the current wars in the Middle East? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3400 Registered: 5-2003 |
Is this in WWI? WWII? Korean? Vietnam? Gulf War? Any of the current wars in the Middle East? None of these. | ||
| Galfisk (Galfisk)
New member Username: Galfisk Post Number: 2759 Registered: 9-2009 |
Was the US involved in the relevant war? Were they soldiers? Were they Americans? Was the old way: easier? Safer? Cheaper? More fun? Explosives involved? Relevant how many "they" were? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3402 Registered: 5-2003 |
Was the US involved in the relevant war? No. Were they soldiers? No. Were they Americans? No. Was the old way: easier? Yes. Safer? No. Cheaper? No. More fun? Possibly. Explosives involved? No. Relevant how many "they" were? Yes, a few hundred to a thousand. | ||
| Galfisk (Galfisk)
New member Username: Galfisk Post Number: 2764 Registered: 9-2009 |
Were they on: land? Air? Water? Underwater? Underground? Were they directly involved in fighting? Was the yopish danger from: enemy? Friendlies? Equipment? Is information relevant? Secrecy? Communications? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3405 Registered: 5-2003 |
Were they on: land? This. Air? Water? Underwater? Underground? Were they directly involved in fighting? No. Was the yopish danger from: enemy? This. Friendlies? Also thisish. Equipment? Also thisish. Is information relevant? Secrecy? Communications? None of these. | ||
| Galfisk (Galfisk)
New member Username: Galfisk Post Number: 2767 Registered: 9-2009 |
Camouflage relevant? Noise? Stealth? Fire involved? Time of day relevant? Or weather? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3408 Registered: 5-2003 |
Camouflage relevant? Noise? Stealth? Fire involved? Time of day relevant? Or weather? No to all. | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 2560 Registered: 4-2010 |
Is training relevant? Is aviation? Are others who were not "they/them" involved? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3410 Registered: 5-2003 |
Is training relevant? Is aviation? Neither. Are others who were not "they/them" involved? Yes. | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 2575 Registered: 4-2010 |
Are the "others" also in the military? On the same side as the "they"? Enemies? Superiors? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3413 Registered: 5-2003 |
Are the "others" also in the military? Yes, and FA. On the same side as the "they"? No. Enemies? Yes. Superiors? In a sense. | ||
| Galfisk (Galfisk)
New member Username: Galfisk Post Number: 2883 Registered: 9-2009 |
Are "they" not in the military? Are they civilians? Do they work for the military? Martial law relevant? Are they in occupied territory? Are they under attack? Did the enemy change the law? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3418 Registered: 5-2003 |
Are "they" not in the military? Correct. Are they civilians? Correct. Do they work for the military? Irr. Martial law relevant? No. Are they in occupied territory? Yes. Are they under attack? No. Did the enemy change the law? Yes. | ||
| Galfisk (Galfisk)
New member Username: Galfisk Post Number: 2921 Registered: 9-2009 |
Was the law changed for their safety? For the safety of someone else? Of occupation forces? Was it religious in nature? Patriotic displays relevant? Was it worse than the previous law? Are they inhabitants of a city? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3421 Registered: 5-2003 |
Was the law changed for their safety? For the safety of someone else? Of occupation forces? Possibly. Was it religious in nature? Patriotic displays relevant? Yes. Was it worse than the previous law? Debateable. Are they inhabitants of a city? Irr. No to the rest. | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 2744 Registered: 4-2010 |
Did the law prohibit certain displays? All displays? Did it demand certain displays? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3424 Registered: 5-2003 |
Did the law prohibit certain displays? All displays? Did it demand certain displays? No to all. | ||
| Galfisk (Galfisk)
New member Username: Galfisk Post Number: 2932 Registered: 9-2009 |
Flags relevant? Certain colors? Or symbols? An action? Did they do the prohibited thing routinely? Did they knowingly and deliberately break the changed law? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3426 Registered: 5-2003 |
Flags relevant? No. Certain colors? No. Or symbols? No. An action? Yes. Did they do the prohibited thing routinely? Yes. Did they knowingly and deliberately break the changed law? Yes. | ||
| Galfisk (Galfisk)
New member Username: Galfisk Post Number: 2966 Registered: 9-2009 |
Did the action involve: Singing? Dancing? speaking? Assembling? Eating? Drinking? Marching? An object? | ||
| Whirligig (Whirligig)
New member Username: Whirligig Post Number: 7 Registered: 8-2010 |
The law is broken because it's easier and possibly more fun the old way? Did the law prohibit an action? Require it? Does this action make something else easier? Is the something else: another action? life in general? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3430 Registered: 5-2003 |
Did the action involve: Singing? Dancing? speaking? Assembling? Eating? Drinking? Marching? None of these. An object? Yes. The law is broken because it's easier This. and possibly more fun Unlikely. the old way? Did the law prohibit an action? Require it? Both really. Hard to answer in a sense. Does this action make something else easier? Not really. Is the something else: another action? life in general? | ||
| Whirligig (Whirligig)
New member Username: Whirligig Post Number: 29 Registered: 8-2010 |
Is the problem: an action (e. g. working, cleaning) is required, but it would be easier to go without it? an action is banned that would make something easier? (e. g. using a calculator instead of pencil + paper) | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3434 Registered: 5-2003 |
Is the problem: an action (e. g. working, cleaning) is required, but it would be easier to go without it? Not this. an action is banned that would make something easier? Yesish, but this is not the only reason they're doing this. (e. g. using a calculator instead of pencil + paper) But not in this sense. There is no 'simplification' involved. | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 3079 Registered: 4-2010 |
Is the object related to the military? Is it a vehicle? A firearm? Electronic? Explosive? Is it larger than a house? A room in a house? A car? A television? A microwave? A brick? A baseball? A golf ball? A marble? A speck of dust? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3446 Registered: 5-2003 |
Is the object related to the military? No. Is it a vehicle? This. A firearm? Electronic? Explosive? Is it larger than a house? A room in a house? A car? A television? A microwave? A brick? A baseball? A golf ball? A marble? A speck of dust? | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 3087 Registered: 4-2010 |
Is the vehicle a car? Truck? Tank? Hummer? Humvee? Motorcycle? Bicycle? Tricycle? Unicycle? Airplane? Sled? Skateboard? Is a curfew relevant? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3448 Registered: 5-2003 |
Is the vehicle a car? Assume this, but any motor vehicle will do. Truck? Tank? Hummer? Humvee? Motorcycle? Bicycle? Tricycle? Unicycle? Airplane? Sled? Skateboard? Is a curfew relevant? No. | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 3106 Registered: 4-2010 |
Did the law apply to certain cars? All cars? Did it prohibit driving on certain roads? | ||
| Galfisk (Galfisk)
New member Username: Galfisk Post Number: 3009 Registered: 9-2009 |
Is the action driving tha car? Is driving prohibited? If so, driving: certain cars? Certain places? At certain times? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3451 Registered: 5-2003 |
Did the law apply to certain cars? All cars? This. Did it prohibit driving on certain roads? No. Is the action driving the car? No. Is driving prohibited? No. If so, driving: certain cars? Certain places? Yopish. At certain times? No to the others. | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 3196 Registered: 4-2010 |
Did the law prohibit people from even being in a certain place? At certain times? At all times? And so, logically, they couldn't drive there? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3452 Registered: 5-2003 |
Did the law prohibit people from even being in a certain place? At certain times? At all times? And so, logically, they couldn't drive there? None of these. | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 3380 Registered: 4-2010 |
Were certain cars prohibited, period? Was it prohibited for cars to drive in certain places? Military bases relevant? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3459 Registered: 5-2003 |
Were certain cars prohibited, period? Was it prohibited for cars to drive in certain places? For svv of places, yopish. Military bases relevant? No to the others. | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 3409 Registered: 4-2010 |
Was it prohibited for cars to be driven? On a specific terrain? On dirt roads? Paved roads? Grass? Was the law intended to protect people? Or just to be restrictive? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3462 Registered: 5-2003 |
Was it prohibited for cars to be driven? On a specific terrain? On dirt roads? Paved roads? Grass? No to all, FA. Was the law intended to protect people? In a sense; you would be in very serious danger if you violated it. Or just to be restrictive? The lawbreakers regarded it this way. | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 3429 Registered: 4-2010 |
Is driving cars relevant? Are seat belts? Is the number of passengers in a car relevant? Does the law prohibit passengers from riding in a certain spot in the car (i.e. standing in the back of a pickup truck)? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3464 Registered: 5-2003 |
Is driving cars relevant? Yes. Are seat belts? Is the number of passengers in a car relevant? Does the law prohibit passengers from riding in a certain spot in the car (i.e. standing in the back of a pickup truck)? None of the rest. | ||
| Galfisk (Galfisk)
New member Username: Galfisk Post Number: 3057 Registered: 9-2009 |
Was it prohibited to: stop? Park? Drive too fast? Too slow? Military vehicles relevant? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3471 Registered: 5-2003 |
Was it prohibited to: stop? Park? Drive too fast? Too slow? None of these. Military vehicles relevant? No. | ||
| Galfisk (Galfisk)
New member Username: Galfisk Post Number: 3065 Registered: 9-2009 |
Is a certain traffic rule relevant? Such as right of way? Is the rule broken while driving? By the driver? Ongoing fighting relevant? Land mines? Other traps? Damage to infrastructure? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3473 Registered: 5-2003 |
Is a certain traffic rule relevant? Yes. Such as right of way? Something like that. Is the rule broken while driving? Yes. By the driver? Yes. Ongoing fighting relevant? Land mines? Other traps? Damage to infrastructure? None of these. | ||
| Galfisk (Galfisk)
New member Username: Galfisk Post Number: 3107 Registered: 9-2009 |
Does the rule require: yielding? for certain vehicles? Vehicles from a certain direction? Does it require driving on a certain part of the road? Or leaving a certain part free? Passing relevant? Turn signals? Traffic lights? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3476 Registered: 5-2003 |
Does the rule require: yielding? for certain vehicles? Vehicles from a certain direction? Does it require driving on a certain part of the road? This. Or leaving a certain part free? Passing relevant? Turn signals? Traffic lights? | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 3602 Registered: 4-2010 |
Left-hand versus right-hand drive relevant? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3479 Registered: 5-2003 |
Left-hand versus right-hand drive relevant? Yes. | ||
| Galfisk (Galfisk)
New member Username: Galfisk Post Number: 3153 Registered: 9-2009 |
So the occupation force required people to drive on the other side of the road? But they kept driving on the same side they always had? | ||
| Jenburdoo (Jenburdoo)
New member Username: Jenburdoo Post Number: 3484 Registered: 5-2003 |
So the occupation force required people to drive on the other side of the road? But they kept driving on the same side they always had? You got it. ************** SPOILER ************** After Argentina invaded the British-owned Falkland Islands in 1982, they required drivers to drive on the right (as in Argentina) instead of on the left (as in British territories). As a sign of patriotism and stubbornness, many Falkland Islanders ignored this regulation and continued to drive on the left, despite the risks of head-on collision and arrest. |
