| Author | Message | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6270 Registered: 8-2001 |
Because Laurette was so conscientious, the police thought she was implicated in the crime. How come? | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 10637 Registered: 4-2010 |
Crime - murder? Attempted murder? Robbery? Attempted robbery? Blackmail? Rape? Arson? Child abuse? Kidnapping? Did Laurette try to help the police? To help solve the crime? Did she call in tips to the police? Visit the crime scene to look for evidence? | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 46 Registered: 1-2011 |
Is time relevant? Is location relevant? Any features of Laurette are relevant? Age? Profession? Race? Religion? Relevant she is a woman? "Implicated in the crime" - the police thought she committed the crime? helped the criminal? implicated as a witness? Was she really involved in the crime? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6271 Registered: 8-2001 |
Balin (Balin) New member Username: Balin Post Number: 10637 Registered: 4-2010 Posted on Saturday, January 08, 2011 - 10:11 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Crime - murder? possibly Attempted murder? ditto dittoRobbery? ditto Attempted robbery? ditto Blackmail? unlikelyRape? possibly Arson? possibly Child abuse? less likelyKidnapping? possibly Did Laurette try to help the police? yes To help solve the crime? no Did she call in tips to the police? noVisit the crime scene to look for evidence? no Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 46 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Saturday, January 08, 2011 - 10:43 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Is time relevant? Is location relevant? Any features of Laurette are relevant? Age? Profession? Race? Religion? Relevant she is a woman? all irrel "Implicated in the crime" - the police thought she committed the crime? helped the criminal? implicated as a witness? could be any of these Was she really involved in the crime? no | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 47 Registered: 1-2011 |
Did Laurette's trying to help the police resulted in: arresting the criminal? solving the case? any disturbances? getting evidence? the police getting on the wrong track? Was she even helpful or did she only think she was helpful while in fact her actions caused troubles? Was there actually any crime comitted? Was suspecting Laurette justified? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6276 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 47 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Saturday, January 08, 2011 - 11:39 pm: Did Laurette's trying to help the police resulted in: arresting the criminal? solving the case? any disturbances? getting evidence? the police getting on the wrong track? all are possible but not necessary Was she even helpful or did she only think she was helpful while in fact her actions caused troubles? irrel Was there actually any crime comitted? no Was suspecting Laurette justified?yope or yesish | ||
| Gregoryuconn (Gregoryuconn)
New member Username: Gregoryuconn Post Number: 595 Registered: 9-2010 |
Did she attempt to give the dead body a proper burial? Before the autopsy? Before the dead body was found by the cops? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6280 Registered: 8-2001 |
Gregoryuconn (Gregoryuconn) New member Username: Gregoryuconn Post Number: 595 Registered: 9-2010 Posted on Sunday, January 09, 2011 - 4:38 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did she attempt to give the dead body a proper burial? no Before the autopsy? no Before the dead body was found by the cops? no | ||
| Kdoc (Kdoc)
New member Username: Kdoc Post Number: 1166 Registered: 7-2001 |
your puzzle statement says 'the crime' but later you answer 'no' to the question 'was there actually any crime committed'... was there a crime? was there something that looked like a crime? did someone say there had been a crime? was a crime suspected? but had not actually been committed? her relevant actions: something she said? a physical action? did she appear to be getting rid of evidence? cleaning something relevant? hiding something? giving someone an alibi? covering for someone else in some way? did they think she was involved in setting a crime up? preparing in some way? getting information to commit a crime? or help someone else? did they think she was involved in the actual committing of a crime? as the main perpetrator? as an accessory? did they think she was involved after the crime? in covering it up? in hiding someone? in disposing of evidence? in disposing of illicit gains from a crime? is money relevant here? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6283 Registered: 8-2001 |
BLOOPERRRALERTTTTTTTTTTTTTT!!!Was there actually any crime comitted? no The answer should be yesyour puzzle statement says 'the crime' but later you answer 'no' to the question 'was there actually any crime committed'... See above BLOPERRRRRALERTTTTTTT!!! was there a crime? yes was there something that looked like a crime? yes did someone say there had been a crime? yeswas a crime suspected? yes but had not actually been committed? no her relevant actions: something she said? yes a physical action? no did she appear to be getting rid of evidence? no cleaning something relevant? no hiding something? no giving someone an alibi? possibly covering for someone else in some way? possibly did they think she was involved in setting a crime up? possibly preparing in some way? possibly getting information to commit a crime? possiblyor help someone else? possibly did they think she was involved in the actual committing of a crime? dittoas the main perpetrator? dittoas an accessory? dittodid they think she was involved after the crime? dittoin covering it up? ditto in hiding someone? ditto in disposing of evidence? ditto in disposing of illicit gains from a crime? dittois money relevant here? possibly | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 10775 Registered: 4-2010 |
Had a person disappeared? | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 69 Registered: 1-2011 |
So, the crime has been committed, the police doesn't know who did it, but they suspect Laurette and have yopishly/yesishly justified reason for this. Does the police know what crime has been committed? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6288 Registered: 8-2001 |
Balin (Balin) New member Username: Balin Post Number: 10775 Registered: 4-2010 Posted on Tuesday, January 11, 2011 - 12:23 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Had a person disappeared? possibly Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 69 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Tuesday, January 11, 2011 - 9:55 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) So, the crime has been committed, the police doesn't know who did it, but they suspect Laurette and have yopishly/yesishly justified reason for this. yes Does the police know what crime has been committed? yes | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 10806 Registered: 4-2010 |
Do they suspect Laurette because of something she said? Did? Said to them? Did Laurette ever talk to the police? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6291 Registered: 8-2001 |
Balin (Balin) New member Username: Balin Post Number: 10806 Registered: 4-2010 Posted on Tuesday, January 11, 2011 - 7:28 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Do they suspect Laurette because of something she said? yesDid?\b {just said} Said to them? yesDid Laurette ever talk to the police? yes | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 83 Registered: 1-2011 |
Maybe Laurette was the one who called the police? Or they interviewed her while investigating the crime? She reported something to the police, that was connected with crime and unknown to anybody else? The crime the police investigates is: murder? sexual abuse? kidnapping? blackmail? forgery? robbery? burglary? other? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6294 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 83 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Tuesday, January 11, 2011 - 10:12 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Maybe Laurette was the one who called the police? possibly but not necessarilyOr they interviewed her while investigating the crime? yesShe reported something to the police, that was connected with crime yes and unknown to anybody else? irrelThe crime the police investigates is: murder? possiblysexual abuse? ditto kidnapping? ditto blackmail? no forgery? no robbery? possibly burglary? ditto other? possibly | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 10916 Registered: 4-2010 |
Did she know the victim? Were they related? Did the police think she might have connections to the victim? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6297 Registered: 8-2001 |
Balin (Balin) New member Username: Balin Post Number: 10916 Registered: 4-2010 Posted on Thursday, January 13, 2011 - 7:00 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did she know the victim? noWere they related? noDid the police think she might have connections to the victim? probably but not necessarily | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 10965 Registered: 4-2010 |
Had she figured something out about the case? That the police hadn't? And reported it in as a tip? But the police assumed the only way she would have known that is if she'd been involved? (Kinda like the pilot episode of Psych...) | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 115 Registered: 1-2011 |
Was her knowledge about the crime somewhat unique? Would any other person with similar knowledge also be suspected? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6302 Registered: 8-2001 |
Balin (Balin) New member Username: Balin Post Number: 10965 Registered: 4-2010 Posted on Friday, January 14, 2011 - 3:13 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Had she figured something out about the case? noThat the police hadn't? no And reported it in as a tip? no But the police assumed the only way she would have known that is if she'd been involved? no (Kinda like the pilot episode of Psych...) Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 115 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Friday, January 14, 2011 - 1:27 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Was her knowledge about the crime somewhat unique?yope Would any other person with similar knowledge also be suspected? yope | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 127 Registered: 1-2011 |
Was it the exact wording of what she said to the police what the suspicions arose from? Or was it something personal about Laurette? Is there anything relevant of Laurette we still don't know? Was the crime about which she spoke to them the same that they were investigating? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6305 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 127 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Friday, January 14, 2011 - 10:50 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Was it the exact wording of what she said to the police what the suspicions arose from?no Or was it something personal about Laurette? no Is there anything relevant of Laurette we still don't know? no Was the crime about which she spoke to them the same that they were investigating? yes | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 133 Registered: 1-2011 |
So conscientious mean that: Laurette was too eager to help the police? Laurette wanted to tell too much to the police? Laurette was trying to do the police job and find evidence/talk to witnesses/see the place of crime/catch the criminal etc.? | ||
| Kdoc (Kdoc)
New member Username: Kdoc Post Number: 1168 Registered: 7-2001 |
are there relevant beliefs by police about the behaviour of perpetrators of crime? such as 'perpetrators always return to the scene of the crime'? is her willingness to help suspicious to them? does she seem too eager? seem to know too much? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6308 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 133 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Saturday, January 15, 2011 - 5:59 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) So conscientious mean that: Laurette was too eager to help the police? noLaurette wanted to tell too much to the police? no Laurette was trying to do the police job and find evidence/talk to witnesses/see the place of crime/catch the criminal etc.? no Kdoc (Kdoc) New member Username: Kdoc Post Number: 1168 Registered: 7-2001 Posted on Saturday, January 15, 2011 - 7:06 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) are there relevant beliefs by police about the behaviour of perpetrators of crime? yes such as 'perpetrators always return to the scene of the crime'? nois her willingness to help suspicious to them? no does she seem too eager? no seem to know too much? no | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 141 Registered: 1-2011 |
Did the police understand Laurette properly? Or was there any misunderstanding involved? Did Laurette try to put accusations? Did Laurette try to justify the criminal? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6311 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 141 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Saturday, January 15, 2011 - 9:17 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did the police understand Laurette properly? yes Or was there any misunderstanding involved? no Did Laurette try to put accusations? no Did Laurette try to justify the criminal? no | ||
| Kdoc (Kdoc)
New member Username: Kdoc Post Number: 1170 Registered: 7-2001 |
her too-conscientious behaviour... was this sonething she did before talking to the police? something she did in response to a crime being committed? something she did to help the police? something she did in reponse to a request from the police? a reaction to a police question? is it relevant when the crime took place? shortly before she was suspected by the police? a long time before? is it relevant where the crime took place? did she know a crime had taken place? did she know what the crime was? did she know who had committed the crime? did she have some kind of interaction with the perpetrator of the crime? was there an escaped convict? did the police think she was lying to them? was she lying? was she being conscientious in keeping a promise she had previously made? to the criminal? not to tell certain things to the police? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6318 Registered: 8-2001 |
Kdoc (Kdoc) New member Username: Kdoc Post Number: 1170 Registered: 7-2001 Posted on Monday, January 17, 2011 - 12:02 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) her too-conscientious behaviour... was this sonething she did before talking to the police? no something she did in response to a crime being committed? yes something she did to help the police? yes something she did in reponse to a request from the police? yes a reaction to a police question? yes is it relevant when the crime took place? somewhat shortly before she was suspected by the police? a long time before? probably at least 2 weeks or so & maybe much longer is it relevant where the crime took place?yope did she know a crime had taken place? yes did she know what the crime was? yes did she know who had committed the crime? yope did she have some kind of interaction with the perpetrator of the crime?yope was there an escaped convict? no did the police think she was lying to them? yes was she lying? no was she being conscientious in keeping a promise she had previously made? noto the criminal? no not to tell certain things to the police? no | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 175 Registered: 1-2011 |
Did the police speak to Laurette shortly after the crime has been committed? Did the police suspect Laurette immediately after speaking with her about the crime? Was any relevant information discovered in between crime and police speaking with Laurette? Or maybe in between police speaking with Laurette and police suspecting her? Did the police think Laurette was lying because they knew something contradict to what she told them? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6323 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 175 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Monday, January 17, 2011 - 9:07 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did the police speak to Laurette shortly after the crime has been committed? yes Did the police suspect Laurette immediately after speaking with her about the crime? no. GOOOOOOOOOD QUESTION!!!! Was any relevant information discovered in between crime and police speaking with Laurette? noOr maybe in between police speaking with Laurette and police suspecting her?yope Did the police think Laurette was lying because they knew something contradict to what she told them? yope | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 207 Registered: 1-2011 |
What Laurette told the police was contradictory to: something that other person told the police? some material evidence? What Laurette said to the police was objectively true? Or Laurette was convinced it's true while it was false? Did Laurette speak to the perpetrator at any time? Did she see the perpetrator at any time? Did she hear the perpetrator at any time? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6325 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 207 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Tuesday, January 18, 2011 - 5:29 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) What Laurette told the police was contradictory to: something that other person told the police? no some material evidence? no What Laurette said to the police was objectively true?yope Or Laurette was convinced it's true yesishwhile it was false? yope Did Laurette speak to the perpetrator at any time? irrel Did she see the perpetrator at any time? probablyDid she hear the perpetrator at any time? possibly | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6333 Registered: 8-2001 |
HINT: Laurette was a witness either to the crime itself or to the perp's presence at the scene of the crime | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 11370 Registered: 4-2010 |
Did she notice a certain detail about the perp? Something that the perp did? | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 241 Registered: 1-2011 |
Did Laurette told the police everything she saw? Did she omit anything she considered irrelevant, but which was in fact relevant? Did she told the police more than she saw, including for example her deductions, what turned on to be irrelevant? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6335 Registered: 8-2001 |
Balin (Balin) New member Username: Balin Post Number: 11370 Registered: 4-2010 Posted on Saturday, January 22, 2011 - 9:47 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did she notice a certain detail about the perp?Isn't that bound to be true if she's a witness? Something that the perp did? possibly Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 241 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Saturday, January 22, 2011 - 10:41 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did Laurette told the police everything she saw? yope Did she omit anything she considered irrelevant, but which was in fact relevant? noDid she told the police more than she saw, including for example her deductions, what turned on to be irrelevant? no | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 11388 Registered: 4-2010 |
Did she say something which she didn't see? But assumed happened? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6336 Registered: 8-2001 |
Balin (Balin) New member Username: Balin Post Number: 11388 Registered: 4-2010 Posted on Saturday, January 22, 2011 - 10:48 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did she say something which she didn't see? possibly But assumed happened? no | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 253 Registered: 1-2011 |
Did Laurette told the police only mere facts? Did she share with the police her whole knowledge about the crime and the perpetrator? Did the police ask her to describe the perpetrator for the reasons of portraiting him? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6340 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 253 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Monday, January 24, 2011 - 2:36 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did Laurette told the police only mere facts? yesDid she share with the police her whole knowledge about the crime and the perpetrator? yes Did the police ask her to describe the perpetrator for the reasons of portraiting him?probably | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 279 Registered: 1-2011 |
If Laurette omitted any facts, would she also be suspected? If Laurette weren't asked to describe the perpetrator, would she also be suspected? | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 11532 Registered: 4-2010 |
Did Laurette know the perpetrator? And provided details about him that no witness would have been able to see? But she knew him, so she provided them? And she became a suspect? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6350 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 279 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Thursday, January 27, 2011 - 8:45 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) If Laurette omitted any facts, would she also be suspected? possiblyIf Laurette weren't asked to describe the perpetrator, would she also be suspected? ditto Balin (Balin) New member Username: Balin Post Number: 11532 Registered: 4-2010 Posted on Thursday, January 27, 2011 - 3:29 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did Laurette know the perpetrator? noAnd provided details about him that no witness would have been able to see? no But she knew him, so she provided them? noAnd she became a suspect? no | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 322 Registered: 1-2011 |
The crucial fact told by Laurette to the police, leading to suspecting her, was it concerning: identity of the perpetrator? physical features of the perpetrator? other, non-physical features of the perpetrator? details of the scene of crime? material evidence? details of the victim? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6354 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 322 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Monday, January 31, 2011 - 7:01 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) The crucial fact told by Laurette to the police, leading to suspecting her, was it concerning: identity of the perpetrator? physical features of the perpetrator? other, non-physical features of the perpetrator? details of the scene of crime? material evidence? details of the victim? could be any of these | ||
| Larru (Larru)
New member Username: Larru Post Number: 3 Registered: 2-2011 |
Did Laurette volunteer any information without being asked? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6358 Registered: 8-2001 |
Larru (Larru) New member Username: Larru Post Number: 3 Registered: 2-2011 Posted on Thursday, February 03, 2011 - 12:53 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did Laurette volunteer any information without being asked? irrel | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6363 Registered: 8-2001 |
HINT: Add to the puzzle statement that she's a witness who gave the police a statement. HINT: What might a really careful & conscientious witness do after giving the police a statement? | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 11727 Registered: 4-2010 |
Did she thank the police? Volunteer to give information on more cases? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6369 Registered: 8-2001 |
Balin (Balin) New member Username: Balin Post Number: 11727 Registered: 4-2010 Posted on Sunday, February 06, 2011 - 12:47 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did she thank the police? noVolunteer to give information on more cases? no | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 348 Registered: 1-2011 |
Any formal acts relevant? Like signing the protocol? Asking for a copy of statement protocol? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6382 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 348 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Monday, February 07, 2011 - 12:38 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Any formal acts relevant?noish Like signing the protocol? noAsking for a copy of statement protocol?noish | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 360 Registered: 1-2011 |
Did she refuse to tell her identity or personal data? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6386 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 360 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Monday, February 07, 2011 - 10:09 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did she refuse to tell her identity or personal data? no | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 375 Registered: 1-2011 |
Did she expressed her willing to witness in court? Did she asked the police for something? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6393 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 375 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Tuesday, February 08, 2011 - 9:06 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did she expressed her willing to witness in court? noDid she asked the police for something? no | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 385 Registered: 1-2011 |
Did Laurette speak to the police only once? Did she change her testimony? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6394 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 385 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Tuesday, February 08, 2011 - 10:04 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did Laurette speak to the police only once? no Did she change her testimony? yes. GOOOOD QUESTION!!! Now all you have to do is figure out what this has to do with her being so conscientious | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 387 Registered: 1-2011 |
Did Laurette, after speaking to the police, realized that something she told was innacurate? That she forgot about something? Was she so conscientious in that she wanted to clear possible mistakes/misunderstandings she could have caused with her initial testimony? Did she then called the police and changed her testimony? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6396 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 387 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Tuesday, February 08, 2011 - 10:32 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did Laurette, after speaking to the police, realized that something she told was innacurate? yopeThat she forgot about something? yope Was she so conscientious in that she wanted to clear possible mistakes/misunderstandings she could have caused with her initial testimony? noishDid she then called the police and changed her testimony? no | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 11813 Registered: 4-2010 |
Did she add details? Omit them? Did she have some sort of recording or photo of the crime? And double-checked against that? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6399 Registered: 8-2001 |
Balin (Balin) New member Username: Balin Post Number: 11813 Registered: 4-2010 Posted on Wednesday, February 09, 2011 - 2:41 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did she add details? possiblyOmit them? ditto Did she have some sort of recording or photo of the crime? no And double-checked against that? no | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 416 Registered: 1-2011 |
Did Laurette, being so conscientious, go through her statement once more at home, verified it (maybe visited the place of crime once again?) and realized she's been inaccurate? So she contacted the police to revise her statement? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6401 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 416 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Thursday, February 10, 2011 - 8:42 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did Laurette, being so conscientious, go through her statement once more at home, verified it (maybe visited the place of crime once again?) and realized she's been inaccurate? noSo she contacted the police to revise her statement? no | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 455 Registered: 1-2011 |
For the second statement, did Laurette contact the police? Or did the police contact Laurette? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6411 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 455 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Sunday, February 13, 2011 - 9:58 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) For the second statement, did Laurette contact the police? no Or did the police contact Laurette? yes | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 464 Registered: 1-2011 |
Is it relevant why the police contacted Laurette for the second time? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6415 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 464 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Monday, February 14, 2011 - 2:40 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Is it relevant why the police contacted Laurette for the second time?yes | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 472 Registered: 1-2011 |
Did the police contact Laurette for the second time because they found new evidence? and wanted to confront them with a witness? Because they found something contradictory to Laurette's first statement? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6416 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 472 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Monday, February 14, 2011 - 10:41 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did the police contact Laurette for the second time because they found new evidence?possibly and wanted to confront them with a witness? possibly Because they found something contradictory to Laurette's first statement? no | ||
| Bsurfkid21 (Bsurfkid21)
New member Username: Bsurfkid21 Post Number: 1 Registered: 2-2011 |
Did Laurette tell the Police she lied to them? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6417 Registered: 8-2001 |
Bsurfkid21 (Bsurfkid21) New member Username: Bsurfkid21 Post Number: 1 Registered: 2-2011 Posted on Tuesday, February 15, 2011 - 6:51 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did Laurette tell the Police she lied to them? no | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 12024 Registered: 4-2010 |
Did Laurette actually lie? Did she recognize the criminal? The victim? Were there any other witnesses? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6420 Registered: 8-2001 |
Balin (Balin) New member Username: Balin Post Number: 12024 Registered: 4-2010 Posted on Tuesday, February 15, 2011 - 10:41 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did Laurette actually lie? noDid she recognize the criminal? possibly The victim? ditto Were there any other witnesses? irrel | ||
| Shez (Shez)
New member Username: Shez Post Number: 66 Registered: 2-2011 |
is it relevant why the police questioned her a 2nd time? Laurette told the truth both times? but her evidence had changed? because of something new she had discovered? remembered? realised? or because the 2nd time she gave a fuller answer? and this gave the impression of a contradiction? or was it something which was true when she said it at the first interview but then circumstances changed and the truth was something else by the 2nd interview? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6429 Registered: 8-2001 |
Shez (Shez) New member Username: Shez Post Number: 66 Registered: 2-2011 Posted on Monday, February 21, 2011 - 1:34 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) is it relevant why the police questioned her a 2nd time? yesish Laurette told the truth both times? No, I said she didn't lie, i.e. she didn't say anything false that she believed to be falsebut her evidence had changed? no because of something new she had discovered? noremembered? yesrealised? no or because the 2nd time she gave a fuller answer? no and this gave the impression of a contradiction? no or was it something which was true when she said it at the first interview but then circumstances changed and the truth was something else by the 2nd interview?\b} no} | ||
| Kdoc (Kdoc)
New member Username: Kdoc Post Number: 1171 Registered: 7-2001 |
so she was suspected of being involved in a crime because her testimony changed? and it changed beccause she had remembered something? or did she add something to her previous testimony? or did she state that she was unsure what she had previously said was correct? so did she make two statements? was she telling the truth the first time? the second? did she believe she was telling the truth the first time? the second? did she realise her testimony had changed? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6433 Registered: 8-2001 |
Kdoc (Kdoc) New member Username: Kdoc Post Number: 1171 Registered: 7-2001 Posted on Thursday, February 24, 2011 - 9:11 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) so she was suspected of being involved in a crime because her testimony changed? yesand it changed beccause she had remembered something? yesor did she add something to her previous testimony? possibly or did she state that she was unsure what she had previously said was correct? yes so did she make two statements? yes was she telling the truth the first time? irrel the second? ditto did she believe she was telling the truth the first time? yes the second? yes did she realise her testimony had changed? not until it was pointed out to her. You have now figured out why the police suspected her. You still need to figure out is how her conscientiousness got her into this predicament. You can do it!! | ||
| Shez (Shez)
New member Username: Shez Post Number: 84 Registered: 2-2011 |
Had she done something between the two interviews in order to improve her memory of what happened? like re-visiting the scene? did her conscientiousness drive her to do something specific? or to do something in a particular way? or to mention a detail or details which she had not been asked for? | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 12259 Registered: 4-2010 |
Was one interview under hypnosis? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6434 Registered: 8-2001 |
Shez (Shez) New member Username: Shez Post Number: 84 Registered: 2-2011 Posted on Friday, February 25, 2011 - 4:27 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Had she done something between the two interviews in order to improve her memory of what happened? yope like re-visiting the scene? no did her conscientiousness drive her to do something specific? yope or to do something in a particular way? no or to mention a detail or details which she had not been asked for? no Balin (Balin) New member Username: Balin Post Number: 12259 Registered: 4-2010 Posted on Friday, February 25, 2011 - 7:10 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Was one interview under hypnosis? no | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 553 Registered: 1-2011 |
Did she do the "conscientious thing" between two interviews? Did the "conscientious thing" involve writing? speaking? moving? double-checking? Did she make notes of any of her testimonies? Did she write a diary? | ||
| Shez (Shez)
New member Username: Shez Post Number: 99 Registered: 2-2011 |
was she being conscientious in the way she expressed herself? the words she used? the amount of detail she tried to provide? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6438 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 553 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Friday, February 25, 2011 - 9:23 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did she do the "conscientious thing" between two interviews? yes Did the "conscientious thing" involve writing? no speaking? no moving? no double-checking? no Did she make notes of any of her testimonies? no Did she write a diary? no Shez (Shez) New member Username: Shez Post Number: 99 Registered: 2-2011 Posted on Friday, February 25, 2011 - 9:25 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) was she being conscientious in the way she expressed herself? that's not it the words she used? ditto the amount of detail she tried to provide? ditto | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 565 Registered: 1-2011 |
Was she so conscientious, that she was re-thinking about her testimony? And then she realized she could have been inaccurate? If that's not it, did the "conscientious thing" involve thinking? watching? reading? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6442 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 565 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Friday, February 25, 2011 - 10:07 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Was she so conscientious, that she was re-thinking about her testimony? no And then she realized she could have been inaccurate? no If that's not it, did the "conscientious thing" involve thinking? yope or noish watching? no reading? yope or noish | ||
| Shez (Shez)
New member Username: Shez Post Number: 103 Registered: 2-2011 |
was it remembering something she had read? eg a number plate? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6443 Registered: 8-2001 |
Shez (Shez) New member Username: Shez Post Number: 103 Registered: 2-2011 Posted on Saturday, February 26, 2011 - 11:28 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) was it remembering something she had read? possibly eg a number plate? ditto | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 581 Registered: 1-2011 |
Did she do the conscientious thing while still in the police building? While at home? At work? Did she do it immediately after her first testimony? Immediately before the second one? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6449 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 581 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Sunday, February 27, 2011 - 10:52 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did she do the conscientious thing while still in the police building? yes While at home? yes At work? yes Did she do it immediately after her first testimony? yesImmediately before the second one? yes | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 12323 Registered: 4-2010 |
Did she take notes as to what she was saying? Record herself talking? | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 589 Registered: 1-2011 |
Did she ask for a witness protection? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6451 Registered: 8-2001 |
Balin (Balin) New member Username: Balin Post Number: 12323 Registered: 4-2010 Posted on Monday, February 28, 2011 - 11:13 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did she take notes as to what she was saying? no Record herself talking? no Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 589 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Tuesday, March 01, 2011 - 10:40 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did she ask for a witness protection? no | ||
| Shez (Shez)
New member Username: Shez Post Number: 144 Registered: 2-2011 |
was the conscientious thing she did simply telling the truth? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6455 Registered: 8-2001 |
Shez (Shez) New member Username: Shez Post Number: 144 Registered: 2-2011 Posted on Tuesday, March 01, 2011 - 3:44 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) was the conscientious thing she did simply telling the truth? no--there was more to what she did | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6465 Registered: 8-2001 |
HINT & RECAP: Add the following to the puzzle description. The police interviewed her 2x & found her second interview contradicted her first in some details, So they thought she was lying. But this actually happened because she was so conscientious. You need to figure out how her conscientiousness did her in. | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 624 Registered: 1-2011 |
Was she aware that her two statements are contradictory? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6474 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 624 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Tuesday, March 08, 2011 - 10:23 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Was she aware that her two statements are contradictory? no | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 632 Registered: 1-2011 |
Did she precisely answer the questions of the police? Or did she rather tell them freely what she saw? Does her conscientiousness have something to do with the way she answers questions? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6476 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 632 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Tuesday, March 08, 2011 - 6:45 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did she precisely answer the questions of the police? Or did she rather tell them freely what she saw? Either is possibleDoes her conscientiousness have something to do with the way she answers questions? no or noish | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6490 Registered: 8-2001 |
HINT: The crucial thing is not something that Laurette did but something that she DIDN'T do. | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 12516 Registered: 4-2010 |
Was it something she didn't do during the first interview? The second? Both? In between the two? After the second? Before the first? | ||
| Shez (Shez)
New member Username: Shez Post Number: 260 Registered: 2-2011 |
is it because she didn't diverge from the first testimony? because she didn't hesitate whilst repeating the testimony? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6494 Registered: 8-2001 |
Balin (Balin) New member Username: Balin Post Number: 12516 Registered: 4-2010 Posted on Monday, March 14, 2011 - 12:06 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Was it something she didn't do during the first interview? yesThe second? noBoth? no In between the two? yes After the second? noBefore the first? no Shez (Shez) New member Username: Shez Post Number: 260 Registered: 2-2011 Posted on Monday, March 14, 2011 - 1:21 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) is it because she didn't diverge from the first testimony? nobecause she didn't hesitate whilst repeating the testimony? no | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 12529 Registered: 4-2010 |
So she didn't do this thing the first time, but did the second, right? Was it something she said? Was it a reaction to something? | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 658 Registered: 1-2011 |
Is the crucial thing that she didn't lie? That she didn't say that she doesn't remember something? | ||
| Shez (Shez)
New member Username: Shez Post Number: 279 Registered: 2-2011 |
is it that she didn't discuss her testimony between the two interviews? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6497 Registered: 8-2001 |
Balin (Balin) New member Username: Balin Post Number: 12529 Registered: 4-2010 Posted on Monday, March 14, 2011 - 9:51 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) So she didn't do this thing the first time yes, but did the second, right? Actually--BLOOPERR ALERTTTTTTTTT: I should have said that whether she did it the second time was irrel Was it something she said? noWas it a reaction to something? yope Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 658 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Wednesday, March 16, 2011 - 10:03 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Is the crucial thing that she didn't lie? no That she didn't say that she doesn't remember something? no Shez (Shez) New member Username: Shez Post Number: 279 Registered: 2-2011 Posted on Wednesday, March 16, 2011 - 2:22 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) is it that she didn't discuss her testimony between the two interviews? no, but you're very ORT | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 680 Registered: 1-2011 |
Is it that she didn't tell anybody about speaking to the police? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6500 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 680 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Friday, March 18, 2011 - 12:57 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Is it that she didn't tell anybody about speaking to the police? no | ||
| Kdoc (Kdoc)
New member Username: Kdoc Post Number: 1175 Registered: 7-2001 |
is body language relevant? good manners? her emotional reaction to the crime? crying? so she was interviewed the first time - told the truth - and there was something relevant that she didn't do? that was somehow linked to her being conscientious? but you say that she might or might not have done that same thing at the second interview? so if she hadn't done that thing at the second interview also - why did the police think the second interview was different to the first? Sorry - not a yes/no question - but confusing me! was the things she didn't do - asking a question? asking for police identification? is there any written material that is relevant here? any relevant person other than the criminal, victim and police? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6503 Registered: 8-2001 |
Kdoc (Kdoc) New member Username: Kdoc Post Number: 1175 Registered: 7-2001 Posted on Saturday, March 19, 2011 - 11:33 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) is body language relevant? good manners? her emotional reaction to the crime? crying? no to all so she was interviewed the first time - told the truth yope - and there was something relevant that she didn't do? yes that was somehow linked to her being conscientious? yes but you say that she might or might not have done that same thing at the second interview? it's irrel if she did it at her second interview so if she hadn't done that thing at the second interview also - why did the police think the second interview was different to the first? Her second statement had some details that were incompatible with the firstSorry - not a yes/no question - but confusing me! was the things she didn't do - asking a question? noasking for police identification? no is there any written material that is relevant here? yesany relevant person other than the criminal, victim and police? no | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 686 Registered: 1-2011 |
Could she withdraw or rectify her first statement, what she didn't do due to her conscientiousness? | ||
| Cryolite (Cryolite)
New member Username: Cryolite Post Number: 1 Registered: 3-2011 |
Hi I'm new here, just started on this one and really wanted to clear a few questions that have been bugging me.. Just let me know if I'm on the right track =) Is Laurette truly innocent? Merely a witness to a crime? Did her conscientiousness lead to a sub-conscious thing that she began doing after the first interview? (Hence not realising it until pointed out by police, but ultimately caused by her conscientious doing in the first place.) Now regarding the difference.. Was it an object she did not recognise in the first interview, but recognised in the second? A voice? A sound? A smell? A sight? Was it something she did not understand in the first, but understood (without her realising) in the second? A language? A code? A jargon? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6507 Registered: 8-2001 |
Cryolite (Cryolite) New member Username: Cryolite Post Number: 1 Registered: 3-2011 Posted on Monday, March 21, 2011 - 8:16 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Hi I'm new here, just started on this one and really wanted to clear a few questions that have been bugging me.. Just let me know if I'm on the right track =) Is Laurette truly innocent? yes Merely a witness to a crime? yes Did her conscientiousness lead to a sub-conscious thing that she began doing after the first interview? noish(Hence not realising it until pointed out by police, but ultimately caused by her conscientious doing in the first place.)yope Now regarding the difference.. Was it an object she did not recognise in the first interview, but recognised in the second? A voice? A sound? A smell? A sight?{no to all} Was it something she did not understand in the first, but understood (without her realising) in the second? A language? A code? A jargon? no to all | ||
| Shez (Shez)
New member Username: Shez Post Number: 324 Registered: 2-2011 |
Did her conscientiousness lead to a sub-conscious thing that she stopped doing after the first interview? | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 689 Registered: 1-2011 |
You didn't answer my question on Sunday March 20... | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6510 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 686 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Sunday, March 20, 2011 - 10:36 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Could she withdraw or rectify her first statement yes, what she didn't do due to her conscientiousness yope? | ||
| Redwine (Redwine)
New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 716 Registered: 1-2011 |
Did she check the relevant laws to check up the possibility of rectifying statement? Did she rectify her statement? Was she aware that her statement needed rectifying? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6521 Registered: 8-2001 |
Redwine (Redwine) New member Username: Redwine Post Number: 716 Registered: 1-2011 Posted on Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - 10:42 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did she check the relevant laws to check up the possibility of rectifying statement? no Did she rectify her statement? yope Was she aware that her statement needed rectifying? no | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6527 Registered: 8-2001 |
RECAP: Add the following to the puzzle description: The police interviewed Laurette 2x and noted discrepancies between her earlier & later statements, which made them suspect she was lying. But the discrepancies were actually the result of her extreme conscientiousness, which led her NOT to do something that most people would do after giving the police a statement. | ||
| Balin (Balin)
New member Username: Balin Post Number: 12868 Registered: 4-2010 |
Did she give either statement at the police station? Both? If the last one, did she drive home in between the two? | ||
| Shez (Shez)
New member Username: Shez Post Number: 459 Registered: 2-2011 |
I think most people would embellish a statement, perhaps even imagining extra details, so is it that she simply told her story simply without doing this? | ||
| Kdoc (Kdoc)
New member Username: Kdoc Post Number: 1178 Registered: 7-2001 |
The things one might do after giving a statement - are any of these relevant?: tell someone else what you had just done? tell someone else the content of your statement? ask to see a transcript? ask to keep a copy of the transcript? ask to have your statement read back to you? say you'll let them know if you subsequently remember anything else? ask to be kept informed of the progress? ask if they have a suspect? had she just forgotten stuff by the second time she asked? and if she had asked for a copy of her first statement she would have been able to remind herself of what she had said? | ||
| Nimue (Nimue)
New member Username: Nimue Post Number: 6535 Registered: 8-2001 |
Balin (Balin) New member Username: Balin Post Number: 12868 Registered: 4-2010 Posted on Tuesday, April 05, 2011 - 4:51 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) Did she give either statement at the police station? Both? If the last one, did she drive home in between the two? all are irrel Shez (Shez) New member Username: Shez Post Number: 459 Registered: 2-2011 Posted on Tuesday, April 05, 2011 - 10:38 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) I think most people would embellish a statement, perhaps even imagining extra details, so is it that she simply told her story simply without doing this?that's not the solution Kdoc (Kdoc) New member Username: Kdoc Post Number: 1178 Registered: 7-2001 Posted on Wednesday, April 06, 2011 - 6:04 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only) The things one might do after giving a statement - are any of these relevant?: tell someone else what you had just done? irrel tell someone else the content of your statement? yesask to see a transcript? yes--it's VERY RELEVANT that she did not do this ask to keep a copy of the transcript? dittoask to have your statement read back to you? ditto say you'll let them know if you subsequently remember anything else? that's not the solution ask to be kept informed of the progress? ditto ask if they have a suspect? ditto had she just forgotten stuff by the second time she asked? yes and if she had asked for a copy of her first statement she would have been able to remind herself of what she had said? ues This is close enough for me to declare a ********** SPOILER ************* When Laurette witnessed a crime & gave her statement to the police, she did not ask for a copy of it because she realized that the police might eventually re-interview her & if so, she wanted to give her memory of the crime, not of her first statement. Unfortunately, when they did re-interview her, there were discrepancies between her first & second statements, which made the police suspicious. Thanks for sticking with it, everyone, & for solving it, Clever Hannah--I thought it would be much easier. See if my new one is! |
