The Chatroom

[Earnest]

Happy new year from Italy guys! May our lateral 2018 be full of new puzzles!

[GalFisk]

Happy new year from Sweden! We're in the same timezone! But hopefully not the same weather (sleet, +1°C).

[Earnest]

+12 ;ppppp ...but I'm actually in the very south of Italy

[WiZ]

Warm wishes from New Zealand. A balmy 24 celsius, an hour and a quarter from Midnight (Jan 1's almost over for another year...)

[Hobbsicle]

Wishing you all an excellent year from the frigid tundra of Texas (16 Fahrenheit, or -8 Celsius).

[LemonCurry]

Happy New Year from Germany, where we‘ve had a bout of untimely spring (+15 C) in my region yesterday.

[Balin]

Happy New Year everyone!
To celebrate I'm dropping one last round of hints on "Click your heels," and have opened a new chatroom thread.

[peter365]

Wishing all my puzzles pals a bhliain nua sasta from Ireland.

[kalira]

Happy belated new year from Old Virginny, where I believe it was around 14 degrees F (-10 Celsius) when it rolled around. WiZ, are you our only Southern Hemispherean that you know of?

I don't have a fancy language I know as well as I suspect Peter does Irish (or would you call it Gaelic?), but I can offer you 新年おめでとう (sheen-nen-oh-meh-deh-toh)

[WiZ]

I am, barring the inevitable return of Psymann, Insight, or Steve from Mudgee.

Edit: In the spirit of wishing a happy new year in our respective languages, I would like to extend a warm Tau Hou hari to you all. Never mind that Maori New Year is on 30 June.

[WiZ]

298 puzzles solved last year, compared to 343 in 2016 and 306 in 2015 (and 666 in 2010!)

We started off tracking for another result like 2016's, but the number of regular hosts dropped off as the year progressed. Prolific puzzle setters such as Redwine, Doriana, Grip, JenBurdoo and others seemed to vanish into the ether. I know that forum regulars tend to fall into erratic cycles of disappearing and returning (I certainly did between 2005 and 2013), but I've been feeling their absence keenly in recent months.

I don't see why we shouldn't be able to grow our membership to rival the glory days of 2010; ours is a fun, harmless forum that welcomes participation from a wide variety of people, and there's no end to the sort of material we can contribute.

Relative newcomers of the LTPF: What brought you here? How did you find out about us? About Lateral Puzzles in general? How can we bring more souls to this forum in this new era? How can we, in the words of a Lyttle Lytton entry, take Lateral Puzzles and make them 2.0?

[Hobbsicle]

A good question. I've been thinking about the "2.0" question, and I'm sure I've concocted a brilliant solution at some point, but I forgot what it was as soon as I woke up.

As one of those regulars who has been around a long time, but has had 2 lengthy periods of drop-off, I sort of ask myself what causes the waxing and waning of interest. I guess it's kind of the same as anything. I get busy with life. There are a lot of things on the internet and elsewhere vying for your interest, and the LTPF isn't exactly the flashiest of those. There aren't even any pictures! But it is a great community here, and I hope to see it thrive.

A handful of general thoughts:

When my podcast launches sometime in the next two or three thousand years, I plan to have some lateral puzzle content, including some puzzles you guys have shared, and I will be plugging this forum there. Since I'm pretty confident I'll have somewhere between 0 and 7.5 billion listeners, you can expect the forum members to grow by a similar range.

I feel like there's got to be a way to expand the "best of year" list and leverage that somehow by sharing it elsewhere, but I'm not sure how exactly.

Could there be more we could do with the site? Have an actual website devoted to lateral thinking, of which the forum is the primary part, but not the first thing the average person stumbles into? At the very least, maybe get that home page looking like something made in this millennium.

Let's see if we can get Beyonce into lateral thinking.

[WiZ]

I think that, more than ever, there is scope to publish as 'Best of' the LTPF. Putting together an E-book should be within our grasp. The trouble would be finding an excuse to draw attention to it. For a while now, I've had vague notions of collaborating with (a) non-profit organisation(s) pertaining to education, mental health or succeeding in business, and releasing this best of with proceeds going to them (tied in with a proposed fundraising exercise/awareness week/what-have-you). It would also solve the royalties nightmare of having a score of LTPFers' fingers in the pie.

I don't know how realistic this is. Paul would most likely have a better idea, having built a career out of applied lateral thinking.

[wwhere]

Well, a bit late but Feliz Año Nuevo/Happy New Year to everyone!

I just discovered this site yesterday (and I'm a bit surprised I didn't found it before). I am from Spain, but living in the UK for almost two years now.

I discovered lateral thinking puzzles in my teen years, mostly thanks to Paul Sloane books, and have always been on the lookout for more of these kind of puzzles.

[peter365]

Welcome to the Forum Wwhere , it's a nice place and I hope you have fun here.

[invisiblemimsy]

Paul Sloane, those were the days! My children and I got the books and would play those puzzles most weekends, and sometimes make up our own (most of which were complete rubbish and included a lot of schoolboy humour. For example, one of my sons was incapable of hosting a puzzle which didn't include condoms). Was there someone on top of the phone box? Had the man watched every single video in the video shop?

Sorry for not introducing myself when I joined a few days ago; I didn't know about the chatroom. I used to be on the old LPTF forum back in the early noughties, though I wasn't very active. I remember an extremely long Sherlock Holmes thread, where he discovered/developed fingerprinting techniques. I thought the forum had finished?

[Balin]

While I was not around then - I found the forum in 2010 - that thread still exists in the archives.

[invisiblemimsy]

Wow. Thanks, Balin!

[KingLouie]

Looking at the LTPF Achievements list... found another.
If a Millennium is reaching 1K posts, is the admin/member that looks for folks that have done so considered a Millennium Falcon?

[peter365]

That list is pretty out there so anything's possible.

I came up with 'the Meucci' I seem to recall.

[EmersonHay]

That's actually funny. Made me chuckle. I'm going to presume that's the case even if it's not lol.

[invisiblemimsy]

@Peter365 - ‘The Meucci’? I mean, I know he was, but related to LTPF?

[peter365]

Yes it's when you're about to post a spoiler and someone beats you to it , rather like the invention of the telephone.

[WiZ]

Hello, fellow Lathusiasts!

I'm working on the clues section for the revised edition of the Puzzel of the Year compendium, and a thought struck me: How close to the solution do you expect the clues section to bring you?

By this, I mean: Do you expect the final clue to give away enough that anyone tackling the puzzle solo should be able to work it out from the information given? Or should it just be a very big nudge, with the idea being that the puzzle will be played in a group situation and the clues should still leave the guests room for a little lateral legwork?

At the moment, I'm opting for the latter. Since the puzzles chosen are usually complex and/or difficult and/or quite specific, I may need to write a lot more than three clues for some of them!

[peter365]

IF you think of quiz shows where you get more points for guessing the answer with only one clue and then the points reduce as you receive more clues the final one is always practically the answer so i'd go with the latter option the big nudge toward the right answer. The first clue should only gently nudge the solvers in the general direction.

For the midget guy in the elevator I'd go with:

Clue 1 - There's something you need to establish about the man

Clue 2 - It's to do with the man's physical qualities

Clue 3 - Think of something you might have with you when it's raining.

[WiZ]

Good, thoughtful answer, Peter. Thanks.

And those are good clues, although I do find it amusing that your first clue was more generous than the last clue to this puzzle as given in Paul's first book.

[peter365]

Generous to a fault me.

[Zanreo]

So... I'm back again, I guess! Been a while since my last visit, just remembered this place and felt like some puzzles again x3

[Earnest]

Happy Easter everyone...assuming everyone celebrate it xD ...If not...have a nice sunday!

[invisiblemimsy]

Happy Easter Earnest!
Is this a puzzle?

[Earnest]

Not a puzzle...just the simplest way to wish anyone happy Easter xD

[Balin]

I'll add it to the chatroom thread.

Happy Easter!

[WiZ]

We really do need to get in touch with Paul about making the Chatroom a pinned announcement.

[peter365]

Guys I took a uniLATERAL decision this morning and I bulk deleted all users who registered but never logged on or posted (In other words spammers).

If you look at our user numbers now they've been greatly reduced and only include people who've actually made a post albeit some very inactive members who only posted once.

I'm going to investigate how to make the chatroom a pinned post in the active puzzles section and that's my next mission.

[peter365]

Ok I've moved the Chatroom to the Active Puzzles Section and I think I have pinned it so that it remains at the top. Hopefully this works.

If you've any feedback please share it.

Oh and get chatting.

Cheers

Peter

[Hobbsicle]

Much better, thanks! Easier to pop in, and hopefully will encourage a bit more frequent discussion.

[Earnest]

Not sure about reactions to this proposal because I do not know how much you would like to preserv your anonymous status...anyhow take it as it is (just a proposal). What if sometimes we do skype call puzzles...like live puzzles...don't know how to explain...anyway i've seen on youtube sonething similar

[GalFisk]

While I haven't been able to participate, I know that there have been a few Skype lateral puzzling sessions, and that they have been quite fun and successful.

[Earnest]

Cool! Let' do it sometimes! I would be really glad to know you...how to say more virtually than just writing!

[JenBurdoo]

Excellent idea, Peter!

I like the idea of a Skype session. Will definitely be there if we can arrange one. Was at another library last week where I was going to be running an online session of the News Literacy Project, a "how-to-spot-fake-news" gamified program that I suspect would interest Mr. Sloane. It being spring break, no one turned up, but I'd run the kids through some classic lateral thinking puzzles the last time I was there and did it again with the other librarians. We all should have been plotting how to get kids into the program, but still. We had a lovely time and there's just something about the faster give-and-take of a live game. I first learned about LTPs around a campfire in Cumberland Gap from a kid who must've read one of the books and posed a number of them to the rest of us. It was years before I found out what they were, though.

[Earnest]

Well yes for sure we should promote this idea across each country ideally...problem is that "thinking" in general and by definition is costly and most people would like to see an immediate gain for their efforts. Which is not the mind set of lateral thinking. To me indeed LTPs were an alternative to classical puzzles which "disclosed" a branch of my brain I did not know to have deactivated for such a long time. And I' m really grateful to this forum! Maybe the internet is the best way to promote lateral thinking...but to me videos are the future and indeed the forum should extend to video making on youtube with the help, possibly, of all its participants!

Anyway...for curiosity...have you ever seen each other gace to face (I mean also on skype of course)

[invisiblemimsy]

How would live skype puzzling work then? I've never seen it.

[JenBurdoo]

I've met Peter and Paul. <snerk>

Skype is videochatting, so simply a way to get everyone in the same "room" and bounce questions off each other to solve a puzzle in an hour, not a month. Especially with the books out there, this is the classic way of doing it, and I think preferable because there is instant feedback. It's possible to do multichats with several windows open on the screen at one time.

[WiZ]

There's a Webathon thread in the Chatroom archives forum, which details the successes and failures of our previous attempt (I didn't take part because of my prohibitive time zone - the session was held during my morning commute).

In other news, I've just updated our 'best of' book with all the nominated puzzles from last years PotY thread, complete with clues. If you'd like a copy, flick me a private message or an e-mail to wellingtao at gmail. Don't forget to give me an e-mail address to send it to

If we get 30 nominations again this year, we'll have 90 in total, which I believe is the minimum number contained in any of Paul's books. I'll then arrange them into categories (I'm thinking Easy > Medium > Hard > Fatal, with fatal being anything involving dead people in the puzzle statement).

[KayleeArafinwiel]

Long time, no see, fellow LTPFers...missed you all I'm doing my best to come up with puzzle ideas but feel somewhat dried out...hopefully seeing what others have been up to will help.

[WiZ]

Welcome back, Kaylee. I hope you find your kittehmuse soon.

I just found the oddest bit of spambot activity: Someone is posting puzzles from the new forum on the old forum, doubtlessly unaware that one is merely a former incarnation of the other:

http://www.lateralpuzzles.com/discus/me ... 1493294049

They then say 'I couldn't find the solution on the internet', and provide two links. One of which is the desired target, the other is the source of the original puzzle (which, of course, also holds the solution. Silly spambot).

As pointless and cluttersome as this is, I must concede that the spambot has a better hit-rate than I when it comes to putting names in puzzle titles.

[KayleeArafinwiel]

oh how strange o_O but...I have come up with a new puzzle! somewhat topical to my interests, and hoping I've remembered how to do puzzles properly...

[peter365]

Welcome back Kaylee it's been a while.

WiZ that's hilarious I was a mod on the old forum but for the life of me I can't recall how to block people. Loving the way he puts the original posters name in the puzzle title. A form of flattery maybe!

[KayleeArafinwiel]

Thanks Peter! And thank you (and Earnest, and Mimsy) for jumping in on my puzzle with very fine questions, which I have answered.

[KayleeArafinwiel]

I hope more questions will be asked! I feel like we're getting close!

[invisiblemimsy]

What is ‘scrund’?

[KayleeArafinwiel]

What is ‘scrund’?

a scrund, as I remember it, is a false belief which one thinks at first to be true, and later discovers the actual truth.

One of my first puzzles on the previous site was a scrund. When I was a small child, I believed that an entertainer who performed at the county fair called himself "The Great Zucchini" because he was made of zucchini. *giggles at child self* It sounded logical at the time

[WiZ]

*Deleted rant about Scrunds - clearly a berserk button for me*

I will say this: Scrunds work best when the misconception is at a high level, and not about the minute details of a subject that people may not even know about broadly. Such puzzles have high rates of abandonment.

That Zucchini Scrund, on the other hand, sounds like it would have been a lot of fun for the participants.

[KayleeArafinwiel]

I had intended to link the puzzle here, but I can't seem to figure out how to link directly to that puzzle in particular. This is all I got http://lateralpuzzles.com/cgi-bin/discus/discus.cgi

The puzzle is in the September 2010 archive (it was something like my second or third puzzle, ever) and is entitled [Kayleetonkslupin ] Veggie Tales (A Scrund)

[WiZ]

http://www.lateralpuzzles.com/discus/me ... 1316474936

[KayleeArafinwiel]

http://www.lateralpuzzles.com/discus/messages/2928/20845.html?1316474936

that's it! How'd you do that?!

[peter365]

I posted a few scrund puzzles myself but I got very tired of them because as WiZ said they became too concentrated on a tiny aspect of something and not on a glaring and embarrassing misunderstanding.

My own scrund about the 12 year old me thinking 'Various Artists' was a heavy metal band because there was some compilation album in the charts falls into the 'how did you think that' category to which scrunds should belong (in my view anyway).

I have to say the India Scrund puzzle that still sits proudly at the top of the active section on the old forum really demonstrated the problem, as the poster allowed it to go on for years and didn't seem to want to bring it to an end even though it appeared every obvious avenue had been explored.

3 years that went on for and I, for one, would be happy never to see a Scrund puzzle again.

Oh if Hominid is on the new forum please tell us what your Indian scrund was.

[WiZ]

Kaylee: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AWizardDidIt

[KayleeArafinwiel]

Kaylee: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AWizardDidIt

Of course a WiZ-ard did it, the question was *how*

[WiZ]

I did a google search for the text string of your name and the puzzle title, and it took me to a unique page reference.

I sometimes 'find' the old forum by searching for 'Wiz nanotribologist'.

[KayleeArafinwiel]

I did a google search for the text string of your name and the puzzle title, and it took me to a unique page reference.

I sometimes 'find' the old forum by searching for 'Wiz nanotribologist'.

oooh, cool!

[Balin]

In the archives, right-clicking and opening a puzzle in a new tab or window will also produce a unique page URL.

[Admin]

What do you think of us trying another interactive live session using either skype or zoom?

Say May 1 or May 7 and 4 pm UK time = 11 am Eastern time?

Paul

[JenBurdoo]

I'd prefer Friday, Saturday or Sunday. Would have to check my schedule to determine which, but am at work by 11 on other weekdays.

[Balin]

I'd like that. (I missed the first one)

[peter365]

I'd love to join in but the time doesn't really suit me as I'd be at work.

A Saturday would be fun.

[WiZ]

3 in the morning for me - but mine is a difficult timezone to work around, so fitting in with me shouldn't be a priority.

[Admin]

How about Sunday May 6 at 4pm - (or even 7 pm if we want to help those down under?)

[Nalkarj]

Hi everyone,

My name’s Karl, from Boston, Massachusetts; I hope the chatroom is the right place for this, but I just wanted to introduce myself—I’m new to these boards, but I’ve long loved lateral puzzles and moved past, say, the midget in the elevator or “a man is running home.”

This sounds like a great place for these puzzle-concepts, so I’m very happy to join in…

[peter365]

Hi Nalkarj and welcome to the forum.

Firstly a big nod to you for taking the time to introduce yourself on the Chatroom (not many new members do that). If you're obsessed with midgets, albatrosses and dead people then you are definitely in the right place.

Get puzzling and have fun!

Going out on a limb here but one of our most active members Balin will be glad to have another Patriots fan on board!

[Balin]

Welcome to the forum Nalkarj!
(Peter is right, assuming you are a Pats fan...)

Admin - that day/time sounds good!

[WiZ]

Welcome, Nalkarj. It is always great to see a new face on this forum, so to speak. I hope you become inspired to set and solve!

You won't find any classics here, fortunately; although I do recall someone posting the one about the hanged man in an empty room above a puddle. Someone asked: Is there an elephant in the room? Did the elephant relevantly urinate? Then the host disappeared and the puzzle was moved to the solved section. I laughed.

[Earnest]

Welcome to the forum!
The three that replied to you are definitely three of the pillars of the forum!

I'm quite new to the forum as well but since I joined it I cannot literally (and lateraly) stop exploring and trying to solve the new and original puzzles posted here. Is a source of great fun, and really a new persepctive to lateral thinking I would say.
Have fun!

[KayleeArafinwiel]

Welcome Karl! And hello Earnest, hope you both enjoy yourselves here as much as I do! I'm glad to meet new people. I've been away from the forum for a while and have only recently returned, but I intend to keep myself here from now on.

With that in mind, I've posted an all new puzzle to replace my recently solved one. No rerun, no carryover from the old site, all new. I hope it's a fun one!

[JenBurdoo]

Welcome, Karl. Hope to see you around.

[KayleeArafinwiel]

My "It began with a blanket, a dog, and a war" has finally been spoyled; the title was a reference to Afghanistan, the "began" part hinting at its being first of the alphabetical list of officially recognized countries on Wikipedia. For anyone who wasn't in there - I'm still looking for Afghani recipes that don't contain onions so I can make a three course meal that I can actually eat If this is how the "cook a meal from every country in the world, alphabetically" project starts out, I don't know how far I can go.

[trebor]

Welcome, Karl. I’ve not been a member for long, but long enough that this shouldn’t be my first post in the chat.

[WiZ]

I think I'm losing my puzzle-setting mojo. I've been keeping the situations coy and vague in order to provide enough of a challenge for this forum, which means they're not all that interesting (oh, for the 'man farts on snake' days) - and yet they're still getting solved in the teens.

[peter365]

At least you have a mojo , i'm rarely able to come up with anything .

I disagree with your assessment of your recent puzzles which are still among the most purely lateral on the forum . Given that each post may consist of lets say an average of 5 questions then it's taking 50-100 questions to solve them .

If you were hosting a puzzle among friends at a dinner party I'd say up to 100 questions to solve would be very satisfactory.

[irishelk]

Kaylee: though I'm not an expert in Afghani food, maybe you can find a recipe in which the onion doesn't appear to be essential, and just omit it? Maybe substitute something you can eat, and like that has a bit of a crunch and a kick. Some kind of radish maybe? Good luck, it sounds like a worthy quest!

WiZ, your puzzles continue to be head-scratching and entertaining. =)

[Balin]

...am I the only one who forgot about the live puzzling session that was mentioned for this past Sunday?

[peter365]

No you are not.

[invisiblemimsy]

Can any of you give me some tips for setting good puzzles please? I seem to set ones which I think are simple but which run aground... they either take ages to solve with only one or possibly two people hanging on till the bitter end... or they get abandoned for long periods/indefinitely. Obviously, as I know the answers, they WILL seem simple for me - I have difficulty judging difficulty.

[Earnest]

Balin you are not...sorry is a very busy period for me guys.

Mimsy you are good in making statements. Since I'm not the right one to make suggestions on puzzle statements, I can just take the perspective of the solver. At least for me it happens that sometimes I do tons of questions in the attempt of grasping every lateral possibility in the highest amount of puzzles possible. But then I get lost. Ideally if one is face to face there is a feedback inmediately and one can focus on just one puzzle for a limited amount of time. So I would say...your puzzles are not difficult in absolute terms, but since they typically (as far as I've solved) involve a story and the solution needs to be found into steps, they require an effort also in terms of "not losing the thread". This is of course just my personal point of view...hope it helps

[Nalkarj]

Hi again everyone,

My apologies for taking a month to post something else—it was unexpectedly busy for a while there, but things have now settled down a bit. Thanks for all the kind words, everyone!

And, yes, Balin, another Pats fan, though I’m more into hockey than football. I think I’ve got a vague idea about your “God’s work” puzzle, Balin, and I’ll try to set one of my own. Thanks again, folks.

Karl

[Nalkarj]

May I also ask if, going forward in the future, all my posts will have to be approved by a moderator?

Thanks.

[Balin]

Nalkarj - I've approved your posts, so you should be good for normal posting now. Good to see you back!

[Nalkarj]

Thanks, Balin! Hoping to do some more in the future.

[WiZ]

Hi, InvisibleMimsy. The question you asked is an important one, and one that we as a forum have been mulling over since the turn of the millennium.

There are a number of things that contribute to a puzzle's longevity. A lot of them are systematic and nothing to do with the parsing of the puzzle - the fact that we're a small forum, that even the easier puzzles tend to have 1-3 members contributing after the initial round of testing assumptions and establishing details (and these solvers may be relatively inactive) etc.

Note also that having puzzles last longer than you expected isn't the sign of failed or poor setting by the host - a lot of people find the more difficult ones interesting, but may not be able to come up with the right questions. This is fine. It's probably because the puzzle is, you know, difficult.

However, there are a few things that contribute to longevity.

• As Earnest alluded to, puzzles that involve setting up context or establishing a series of events tend to take longer than those hinging on a certain lateral leap. Consider albatross soup or the doctor sending his arm in the post against the dwarf in the elevator or the cowboy facing down the bartender's gun.
  
• Puzzles based on testing assumptions also tend to be solved quicker than those involving creative thinking - even though the basic question is 'how', look at the Two Americans who somehow had the same son versus the party punch with the poisoned ice cubes. Look also at the fact that forum members say 'H/A/M?' almost as a reflex.
  
• The importance of context is also a factor - the man who lies dead next to a stick and a pile of wood shavings only makes sense in light of his own life story (which must be established through questioning), whereas the man who finds his wife dead and a stranger in the car could happen to more or less any adult male.

But the main one, in my opinion, is the amount of information you're willing to give away from the outset. Consider:

'The music stopped. He died. Explain'

vs.

'A man is driving quickly through the suburbs. He turns on the car radio, but hears only silence. He gasps in horror, and then, like, kills himself. Why?'

The first will take longer to solve, but will have a range of satisfying alternate answers (you were probably thinking of the tightrope walker until you read the second framing), whereas the second cuts out a lot of lines of questioning, but will lead the solver to an answer that is likely the best fit for the puzzle question.

And this is a relative mild example. A lot of the puzzles seen on this forum over the last two decades have been exceptionally vague - both in terms of the scenario and what they want the solver to do with it. We'd see puzzles that simply said 'It was square'. That's it. Not only did it present a scenario that I had no trouble believing, I had no idea what to do with this information. I would basically have to ask the host what the puzzle was, which for me defeated the purpose of the exercise, and gave me no incentive whatsoever to start off. And the answer was invariably several paragraphs of text, illustrating a lavish story, most of the details of which were irrelevant, but there were enough important steps along the way to reveal what 'it' was, and lend enough credence to the suggestion that its being square was in some way unusual or noteworthy. This is all very similar to how I assess the underlying legal interest in a long-winded Caveat Against Dealings lodged against a certificate of title by a practitioner. I don't need to deal with this from you guys.

One final contributing factor is whether or not the key to the solution is establishing its logic, or working out specific details. The 20-questions style puzzles in which the spoiler will only be posted once we've established that the murder weapon was a dark green rotary telephone will necessarily take longer than the one in which we established someone was strangled to death with a flexible cord.

Among the puzzles you've posted, my favourites include:

'Face the music' - A nice amount of detail presenting an odd scenario and demanding an explanation, leading to a good set of assumptions-testing around your role in the concert and the physics of playing the note, followed by establishing the nature of the item that played it
'Sign of the times 2' - A very clear scenario demanding explanation was presented. The nature of what needed to be worked out was clear from the outset, and the answer was simple and satisfying.

I actually quite liked 'Songbirds of pain' - the scenario presented in the answer was great, and coming up with questions worthy of such an answer is extremely difficult. The two sentences you posted demanded a causal link, and the one you provided in the spoiler was a satisfying one. The puzzle lasted longer due to the solution ticking off pretty much all the above boxes - The answer required context (she was addicted to pain and intrusive surgery) a series of events (the various operations, the husband not being able to go with her and therefore needing to meet her at the airport, the big 'reveal' etc), applied creative thinking (there are many ways and reasons to break legs or leave spouses - which ones apply here) and vagueness (who are they? why are they breaking her legs? What's the timeframe here? Why does she leave her husband? What does he have to do with it, anyway?). Therefore, it was long, but satisfying.

Gimmicks like posting the puzzle in an accent, in poetic metre, or using LOLspeak can be a way to throw in a red herring, I guess. I personally find them off-putting, but others disagree.

Also, it should be noted that my approach to puzzles is famously conservative and this forum basically thrives off the efforts of members who aren't quite so precious

[JenBurdoo]

One of my own issues is figuring out when to declare a puzzle spoiled - fairly often I've let it go on because there was some specific detail unsolved that, in hindsight, was not that important. A couple of my military espionage puzzles worked out that way, including one of my first, because the solver worked out the basic answer but not the specific location/time/characters involved. I also tend to pick very specific historical scenarios that are really only interesting to me; either way it's more obvious when, as here, there are few people around trying to solve.

[Earnest]

....just another topic...if there is a caveat on early spoiler...can I do WAGs? Until now I've alway understood that caveat earlyspoiler meant "if you know the answer or you think you have read the answer somewhere/ remember it because you have already solved the puzzle, send a PM to the puzzle maker"...is it not like that? If not sorry every time I did WAGs when there was the caveat :s

[WiZ]

I normally impose the caveat if I think:

- someone else might have seen the source of the puzzle, or
- someone with a particular area of knowledge would be at a big advantage, or
- the puzzle hinges on a single lateral leap, which would be well-hidden, but someone could nonetheless be reasonably sure of the answer without any further information.

Wild guessing is usually incorrect, usually entertaining, and usually fine

[peter365]

I love a WAG myself and i think they're absolutely fine. I'd agree with WiZ on the early spoiler, nothing wrong with spoiling early if you've arrived at the answer through sound lateral questions and reasoning but if you're familiar with the topic or have read something similar you should avoid posting the solution to give others a chance.

I was guilty of an early spoil of one of his recently but I didn't for a second consider it likely to be the answer I was merely trying to eliminate something from my thinking. I felt bad but it was accidental.

Don't forget folks that puzzles are born to be solved and the greater the length of time or number of posts it takes is not always a measure of quality.

[Earnest]

Totally agree with peter and thanks WiZ for clarifications

[Earnest]

A question about puzzle statements...I've recently done a puzzle but not sure about whether is "fair" or not my statement...in particular I've included some useless details to make the story more complicated. What do you think about it? Let me know please

[WiZ]

As a host, I find it more satisfying to let the solvers misdirect themselves (through making assumptions and pursuing lines of questioning that aren't useful) than misdirecting them myself.

I also try to make the solution be the best possible answer to the question, so adding additional detail could compromise that (this can backfire sometimes - if I add detail to the puzzle statement simply in order to rule out an obvious solution, I can get a string of questions relating to this detail - the Athole puzzle is quite a good example of this).

The reaction I'm hoping to prompt when the spoiler is posted is 'You magnificent bastard' rather than just 'You bastard'.

[Earnest]

Ahahhahahaga perfect. Thanks!

[peter365]

WiZ

As bastards go you're pretty magnificent!