[gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Current and recently solved lateral thinking puzzles. Please post new lateral thinking puzzles here.

Moderators: peter365, Balin, kalira, JenBurdoo, Tiger

[gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby gregoryuconn » Mon Aug 27, 2018 11:58 pm

A precaution intended to prevent embarrassment instead created it. Perhaps they should have thought it through better.

Based on a true story, but with an added element.
gregoryuconn
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Northern Virginia, USA

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby Earnest » Tue Aug 28, 2018 9:05 am

Privacy relevant? Something used to cover something? Something wanting to be anonymous? Was it in a tv show? In a shop? In a street? In a public place? In a building? A commercial building? An hotel? A swimming pool? An halley? Other places?
On a piece of clothing? On a car? On the internet? On a website? On a social network?

Embarassment = nudity? Related to someone? Someone discovered in doing something? Money relevant? Not recognising someone voice relevant?

Precaution = a panel? A dress? An additional room? A place? A dressing room? Betraying wife or husband relevant?

Created embarassment = revealed something? Made something public?
Earnest
 
Posts: 1809
Joined: Tue May 30, 2017 7:52 am

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby GalFisk » Tue Aug 28, 2018 12:04 pm

Did it create the same type of embarassment it was supposed to prevent? Clothing relevant? Odors relevant? Bullying? Kids? Teens? Sexuality? Toilets? It the precaution a rule? An object? An action?
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8112
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby gregoryuconn » Tue Aug 28, 2018 10:34 pm

Privacy relevant? No. Something used to cover something? No. Something wanting to be anonymous? Was it in a tv show? In a shop? In a street? In a public place? In a building? A commercial building? An hotel? A swimming pool? An halley? Other places?
On a piece of clothing? On a car? On the internet? On a website? On a social network? No to all of these except possibly (but not mainly) a website.

Embarassment = nudity? No. Related to someone? Yes. Someone discovered in doing something? Money relevant? Not recognising someone voice relevant? No to the rest of these.

Did it create the same type of embarassment it was supposed to prevent? Yes. Clothing relevant? No. Odors relevant? No. Bullying? No. Kids? No. Teens? No. Sexuality? Some might argue this, but there are other interpretations. Toilets? No. It the precaution a rule? That's part of it. An object? No. An action? No.

Precaution = a panel? A dress? An additional room? A place? A dressing room? Betraying wife or husband relevant? Nothing like this.

Created embarassment = revealed something? DOYD. Made something public? In a way.
gregoryuconn
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Northern Virginia, USA

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby invisiblemimsy » Tue Aug 28, 2018 10:39 pm

Baby-changing? Breastfeeding? Unisex and/or transgender facilities?
Embarrassment caused by: sight, hearing, touch, taste, or smell?
Embarrasment experienced by: sight, hearing, touch, taste, or smell?
Embarrassment caused by: male, female, other gender, child, adult, animal?
Embarrassment experienced by: male, female, other gender, child, adult, animal?
Was food involved? Sport? Arts? Other hobby?
User avatar
invisiblemimsy
 
Posts: 1480
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 11:16 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby gregoryuconn » Tue Aug 28, 2018 11:34 pm

Baby-changing? Breastfeeding? Unisex and/or transgender facilities? No, completely on the wrong track.
Embarrassment caused by: sight This is closest, but be careful FA., hearing, touch, taste, or smell?
Embarrasment experienced by: sight Same as above hearing, touch, taste, or smell?
Embarrassment caused by: male, female, other gender, child, adult, animal? Group of young adults, assume mixed gender. It would work if they were older, though.
Embarrassment experienced by: male, female, other gender, child, adult, animal? At least two people, gender and age irrelevant. One of them was an adult woman IRL, but it could work for anyone. I suppose in one case it could work with an animal if animals could feel embarrassment, but the other one probably wouldn't (depends on the animal, though, I guess.)
Was food involved? Sport? Arts? Other hobby? Might have been a hobby for some, no to rest, at least not relevantly.
gregoryuconn
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Northern Virginia, USA

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby GalFisk » Wed Aug 29, 2018 6:50 am

Imaging relevant? Thermal? Video? Photo? X-day? Millimeter-wave? Security relevant? Technology? Tattoos? Cosmetics? A certain part of the body?
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8112
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby gregoryuconn » Wed Aug 29, 2018 6:12 pm

Imaging relevant? Thermal? Video? Photo? Partially. X-day? Millimeter-wave? Security relevant? Technology? Tattoos? Cosmetics? No to all the rest of these except possibly for svv of technology. A certain part of the body? Indirectly, in a way.
gregoryuconn
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Northern Virginia, USA

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby invisiblemimsy » Wed Aug 29, 2018 6:54 pm

Was the photo or partially-photo overprinted with something? Was part of it covered up, hidden or similar? Was it intended for a specific use or uses, aside from preventing embarrassment? Was the embarrassment experienced by the people in the partially-photo? By others? When you say 'mixed gender' do you mean the young adults were trans or transitioning or some-such? Or that the group contained men and women?
User avatar
invisiblemimsy
 
Posts: 1480
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 11:16 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby gregoryuconn » Wed Aug 29, 2018 8:44 pm

Was the photo or partially-photo overprinted with something? No Was part of it covered up, hidden or similar? No. Was it intended for a specific use or uses, aside from preventing embarrassment? No Was the embarrassment experienced by the people in the partially-photo? Yes but FA - the photo was fully there but is only partially relevant. By others? This too. When you say 'mixed gender' do you mean the young adults were trans or transitioning or some-such? Or that the group contained men and women? This (although it would work if they were trans, I suppose.)
gregoryuconn
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Northern Virginia, USA

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby GalFisk » Thu Aug 30, 2018 4:55 pm

Indirectly-relevant body part: face? Fingers? Hands? Arms? Legs? Feet? Toes? Belly? Back? Neck? Head? Ears? Nose? Eyes? Mouth? Genitals? Inner organs? Skin? Bone? Blood? Genetics relevant? Bullying?
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8112
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby gregoryuconn » Fri Aug 31, 2018 9:38 am

Indirectly-relevant body part: face? Fingers? Hands? Arms? Legs? Feet? Toes? Belly? Back? Neck? Head? Ears? Nose? Eyes? Mouth? Genitals? Inner organs? Skin? Bone? Blood? Butt Genetics relevant? Bullying? No to rest.
gregoryuconn
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Northern Virginia, USA

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby GalFisk » Fri Aug 31, 2018 3:52 pm

Toilets relevant? Underwear? Sitting? Pooping? Farting? Is the word butt relevant? Ass? Is censorship relevant? Replacing the word "ass" with "butt"? Accidentally transforming the word "assassination" to "buttbuttination"?
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8112
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby gregoryuconn » Fri Aug 31, 2018 7:23 pm

Toilets relevant? Underwear? Sitting? Pooping? Farting? Is the word butt relevant? A phrase with this word, no to rest. Ass? Is censorship relevant? Replacing the word "ass" with "butt"? Accidentally transforming the word "assassination" to "buttbuttination"?
gregoryuconn
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Northern Virginia, USA

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby jumpingjacks » Sat Sep 01, 2018 12:34 am

In the phrase with "butt" in it, does "butt" actually mean the human body part we sit on? Or as in a head butt? Or as in target, ie. "butt of the joke"?

Is a play or some sort of script relevant? I remember Othello's line - "Here is my journey's end, here is my butt" - that caused some amusement when our teacher jokingly pointed out that this was not an implied stage direction.
User avatar
jumpingjacks
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 4:54 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby invisiblemimsy » Sat Sep 01, 2018 3:40 pm

Is this to do with a body scanner? Perhaps to be used instead of a hands-on body search? Was a butt plug in situ?
User avatar
invisiblemimsy
 
Posts: 1480
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 11:16 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby Earnest » Sat Sep 01, 2018 4:30 pm

But vs butt relevant? Synonyms of butt?
Butt scanner on printer relevant?
Is it something like a ban that, had not been present, nobody would have thought to do the something causing embarassment? (E.g. next to a printer there was the ban of doing butt scannering maybe also with an advice that there was video surveillance. Had the ban not been present nobody would have thought about doimg butt scannering).
Is the word butt present on a piece of paper? If so was it meant by the writers to write down "butt"?
Earnest
 
Posts: 1809
Joined: Tue May 30, 2017 7:52 am

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby gregoryuconn » Sat Sep 01, 2018 11:11 pm

But vs butt relevant? Synonyms of butt?
Butt scanner on printer relevant?
Is it something like a ban that, had not been present, nobody would have thought to do the something causing embarassment? (E.g. next to a printer there was the ban of doing butt scannering maybe also with an advice that there was video surveillance. Had the ban not been present nobody would have thought about doimg butt scannering).
Is the word butt present on a piece of paper? Probably Yes, DOYD of "piece of paper", no to the rest of these. If so was it meant by the writers to write down "butt"?

In the phrase with "butt" in it, does "butt" actually mean the human body part we sit on? Assume this. Or as in a head butt? Or as in target, ie. "butt of the joke"?

Is a play or some sort of script relevant? I remember Othello's line - "Here is my journey's end, here is my butt" - that caused some amusement when our teacher jokingly pointed out that this was not an implied stage direction. No.

Is this to do with a body scanner? Perhaps to be used instead of a hands-on body search? Was a butt plug in situ? No to all, completely OTWT.
gregoryuconn
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Northern Virginia, USA

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby Balin » Tue Sep 04, 2018 4:09 pm

Is this an instance of the Scunthorpe Problem?
Photocopying one's rear relevant?
Balin
 
Posts: 6880
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 11:12 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby gregoryuconn » Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:16 am

Is this an instance of the Scunthorpe Problem?
Photocopying one's rear relevaont? No to all.
gregoryuconn
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Northern Virginia, USA

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby GalFisk » Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:11 pm

Is "butt" used instead of some other word? Instead of ass? Is the biblical ass replaced with butt?
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8112
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [gregoryuconn] You Fool!

Postby gregoryuconn » Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:46 am

Is "butt" used instead of some other word? Instead of ass? Is the biblical ass replaced with butt? No, all this is completely OTWT.
gregoryuconn
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Northern Virginia, USA


Return to Active Lateral Thinking Puzzles

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
cron