[GalFisk] Oaf

Current and recently solved lateral thinking puzzles. Please post new lateral thinking puzzles here.

Moderators: peter365, Balin, kalira, JenBurdoo, Tiger

[GalFisk] Oaf

Postby GalFisk » Tue Sep 11, 2018 3:12 am

His lack of skill and bad luck made it plain to see that he was both skilled and lucky.
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8190
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [GalFisk] Oaf

Postby invisiblemimsy » Tue Sep 11, 2018 6:35 am

His lack of skill was made up for by being lucky?
His bad luck was made up for by being skilled?
Luck 1 = luck 2?
Skill 1 = skill 2?
User avatar
invisiblemimsy
 
Posts: 1512
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 11:16 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: [GalFisk] Oaf

Postby GalFisk » Tue Sep 11, 2018 6:45 am

His lack of skill was made up for by being lucky?
His bad luck was made up for by being skilled? Yesish to both.
Luck 1 = luck 2?
Skill 1 = skill 2? No to both.
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8190
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [GalFisk] Oaf

Postby Earnest » Tue Sep 11, 2018 7:00 am

Is the male version of the girl in Deadpool2 relevant?

So thanks to an event due to bad luck (gambling? He was randomly shot in a pub?...) he was able to demonstrate that he was lucky (in the sense that it could have gone worse?) and skilled?
Earnest
 
Posts: 1906
Joined: Tue May 30, 2017 7:52 am

Re: [GalFisk] Oaf

Postby invisiblemimsy » Tue Sep 11, 2018 8:17 am

Skill 1: literary, art, science, knowledge, dexterity, performance, a craft, an employment, a knack, a hobby, an innate/natural ability, a learned skill?
Same Q’s Skill 2:
Luck 1 and Luck 2: same fields as Skill or different?
User avatar
invisiblemimsy
 
Posts: 1512
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 11:16 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: [GalFisk] Oaf

Postby GalFisk » Tue Sep 11, 2018 1:29 pm

Is the male version of the girl in Deadpool2 relevant?
No.
So thanks to an event due to bad luck (gambling? He was randomly shot in a pub?...) Yes, but none of the examples. he was able to demonstrate that he was lucky (in the sense that it could have gone worse?) and skilled? Yes to both. It could've gone worse.

Skill 1: literary, art, science, knowledge, dexterity, performance, a craft, an employment, a knack, a hobby, an innate/natural ability, a learned skill?
Same Q’s Skill 2:
Luck 1 and Luck 2: same fields as Skill or different?
Skill 1: science, hobby, learned.
Skill 2: knowledge, hobby, learned.
Luck 1: combination of the fields of skill 1 and 2
Luck 2: same field as skill 2
Last edited by GalFisk on Wed Sep 12, 2018 2:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8190
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [GalFisk] Oaf

Postby Earnest » Tue Sep 11, 2018 7:14 pm

Science: chemistry? Medicine? Pharma? Geology? Math? Astronomy? Others?
Fire involved? Experiments? On the field experiments? In a lab? Broken bones? Sonething falling?

Kitchen involved? Water boiling? Cars? Technology? Pc? Tv? Phones? Other devices? Something burning? Failing in writing down a formula? In explaining something? Are puns relevant? Acting? Making laugh someone? Cooking?

Is it something like for bad luck and the lack of practice with skill1 something went wrong but he was able to solve the issue using skill2 and a little bit of luck? Are science and knowledge of skill1 and skill2 related?
Earnest
 
Posts: 1906
Joined: Tue May 30, 2017 7:52 am

Re: [GalFisk] Oaf

Postby invisiblemimsy » Tue Sep 11, 2018 9:42 pm

Is this a pub quiz team or Mastermind thingy? Is this something that did, or could, happen in real life? Movie, book, FYI?
User avatar
invisiblemimsy
 
Posts: 1512
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 11:16 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: [GalFisk] Oaf

Postby GalFisk » Wed Sep 12, 2018 2:28 am

Science: chemistry? This, ultimately.Medicine? Pharma? Geology? Math? Astronomy? Others? Would be more well known as this.
Fire involved? No. Experiments? On the field experiments? In a way. Wouldn't necessarily call it an experiment. In a lab? Broken bones? Sonething falling? Yes.

Kitchen involved? Water boiling? Cars? Technology? This. Pc? Tv? Phones? Other devices? This. Something burning? Failing in writing down a formula? In explaining something? Are puns relevant? Acting? Making laugh someone? Cooking? No to the others.

Is it something like for bad luck and the lack of practice with skill1 something went wrong but he was able to solve the issue using skill2 and a little bit of luck? More like "the issue was of much smaller consequence because of skill and luck".Are science and knowledge of skill1 and skill2 related? No.

Is this a pub quiz team or Mastermind thingy? No. Is this something that did, or could, happen in real life? Yes, it did happen.Movie, book, FYI?
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8190
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [GalFisk] Oaf

Postby Earnest » Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:53 am

Chemistry... something like helium in balloons? Hot-air balloons relevant? Is the hobby a common one involving chemistry indirectly? Are some substances involved? E.g. venoms?
Is Coke involved?
Earnest
 
Posts: 1906
Joined: Tue May 30, 2017 7:52 am

Re: [GalFisk] Oaf

Postby GalFisk » Wed Sep 12, 2018 10:20 am

Chemistry... something like helium in balloons? Hot-air balloons relevant? No to both. Is the hobby a common one involving chemistry indirectly? No. Are some substances involved? Yes. E.g. venoms? No.
Is Coke involved? No.
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8190
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [GalFisk] Oaf

Postby Earnest » Wed Sep 12, 2018 11:20 am

Substances = common ones? Mostly Solid? Gas? Liquid? Can I invole the list of elements in the periodic system? Metal? Iron? Gold? Silver? Water? A dangerous element? Acid? Others?

Something falling = the substance falling?
Earnest
 
Posts: 1906
Joined: Tue May 30, 2017 7:52 am

Re: [GalFisk] Oaf

Postby GalFisk » Wed Sep 12, 2018 4:38 pm

Substances = common ones? Yes. Mostly Solid? This. Gas? Liquid? Can I invole the list of elements in the periodic system? That would not be very helpful. Metal? Iron? Gold? Silver? Normally no metals.Water? Could be. A dangerous element? Normally not. Acid? Don't know. No strong ones. Others? Yes.

Something falling = the substance falling? It fell too, but it was not the main thing.
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8190
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [GalFisk] Oaf

Postby Hobbsicle » Tue Dec 04, 2018 4:18 pm

Is this something that happened to you, by chance?

Did this happen in a building? Outside?

Substances involved: Mineral? Organic? Wood? Stone? Plastic? Fiber? Rubber? Glass? Paper? Is it in grain/powder form? Explosives relevant? Fireworks? Projectiles?
Hobbsicle
 
Posts: 714
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 11:42 am
Location: Texas, United States

Re: [GalFisk] Oaf

Postby Earnest » Wed Dec 05, 2018 8:19 am

Is a discovery relevant? Was it recognized that he was skilled and lucky formally? After years? After months? Immediately? Did he manage to solve/attenuate an unsolved issue? Did he risk to die? Are charges relevant? Is fire/heat relevant? Is cold and ice? Is internet relevant? Electronics and water? Was him in a dangerous situation? Mountains relevant?

Technology = iPad? Stereo? Household appliances? Something that can commonly be found in houses? Fluo lights? Headphones? Electronic fireplace? Airplanes?

Was he falling with the something that was falling? Was the something falling because thrown by someone? By him? Because something went wrong? Falling = falling from the sky? Falling in the sea? (E.g. he was captain of a ship which was sinking) was the something falling from an exceptional height? Was the something supposed to fall down? Is airbag system relevant? Parachute? War times relevant?
Earnest
 
Posts: 1906
Joined: Tue May 30, 2017 7:52 am

Re: [GalFisk] Oaf

Postby GalFisk » Thu Dec 06, 2018 4:57 pm

Is this something that happened to you, by chance? No.

Did this happen in a building? Outside? This.

Substances involved: Mineral? No. Organic? Carbon-based, but not life-based. Wood? Stone? No to both. Plastic? Plastic is involved. Fiber? Rubber? Something that may be a bit like rubber. Glass? Paper? Is it in grain/powder form? Explosives relevant? Fireworks? No to all. Projectiles? No, but see below.
Hobbsicle


Is a discovery relevant? Was it recognized that he was skilled and lucky formally? No to both. After years? After months? Immediately? After less than an hour. Did he manage to solve/attenuate an unsolved issue? He managed to make a big problem smaller. Did he risk to die? Noish. Are charges relevant? Is fire/heat relevant? Is cold and ice? Is internet relevant? No to all. Electronic Yes. and water? But no. Was him in a dangerous situation? Yope, DOYD, Mountains relevant? No.

Technology = iPad? Stereo? Household appliances? No to all. Something that can commonly be found in houses? Noish. Fluo lights? Headphones? Electronic fireplace? No to all. Airplanes? An airplane is involved.

Was he falling with the something that was falling? Well, he was falling, and something fell. Was the something falling because thrown by someone? No. By him? He did something, but not throw it.Because something went wrong? Yes. Falling = falling from the sky? Yes. Falling in the sea? No. (E.g. he was captain of a ship which was sinking) No. was the something falling from an exceptional height? DOYD. 1000-1500 meters I think. Was the something supposed to fall down? Yes, but... Is airbag system relevant? No. Parachute? Yes. War times relevant? No.
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8190
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [GalFisk] Oaf

Postby trebor » Thu Dec 06, 2018 5:22 pm

Does this happen in the 21st century? 20th? In the early days of the parachute? Was the something that fell attached to him? To the parachute? To cause the thing to fall, did he: kick it? Push it? Touch it at all?

Trying to figure out the noish to "risk to die". Did he die? although perhaps he thought what he was doing was not risky? Was he testing something? Did he risk injury?
trebor
 
Posts: 590
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2016 12:23 am
Location: Canada

Re: [GalFisk] Oaf

Postby Earnest » Fri Dec 07, 2018 8:58 am

So he intended to do skydiving right? If so is 1000-1500 meters the height ib which the problem occurs? I mean did he take up skydiving from a plane flying at an heigher distance and then a problem occurred at 1000-1500 meters? Does the problem involve nature? (A storm; wind; others?) Was the parachute open at 1000-1500 meters? If not did he manage to find a safe place to land in? Were there others relevantly skydiving with him? Communications with others relevant? Coordination? Is some show performed?

Wingsuit relevant? Walkie talkie? Is automatic opening of parachute relevant? Did he manage to open it manually? Was there an emergency parachute? Relevant? Was him unable to open the parachute for the presence of birds? Are helping signals relevant?
Earnest
 
Posts: 1906
Joined: Tue May 30, 2017 7:52 am

Re: [GalFisk] Oaf

Postby GalFisk » Fri Dec 07, 2018 4:30 pm

Does this happen in the 21st century? Yes. 20th? No. In the early days of the parachute? No. Was the something that fell attached to him? Yes. To the parachute? No. To cause the thing to fall, did he: kick it? Push it? Touch it at all? No to all.

Trying to figure out the noish to "risk to die". Did he die? No. although perhaps he thought what he was doing was not risky? He was skydiving, which has some inherent risks, but the risk of death is fairly low. Was he testing something? Yesish. Did he risk injury? Noish.


So he intended to do skydiving right? Yes. If so is 1000-1500 meters the height ib which the problem occurs? Yes. I mean did he take up skydiving from a plane flying at an heigher distance and then a problem occurred at 1000-1500 meters? No, it ocurred right when he exited the airplane. Does the problem involve nature? (A storm; wind; others?) Yes, wind. Was the parachute open at 1000-1500 meters? No. If not did he manage to find a safe place to land in? Yes. Were there others relevantly skydiving with him? They were, but irr. Communications with others relevant? Coordination? Is some show performed? No to all.

Wingsuit relevant? Walkie talkie? Is automatic opening of parachute relevant? No to all. Did he manage to open it manually? Yes. Was there an emergency parachute? The reserve did not need to be used. Relevant? No.Was him unable to open the parachute for the presence of birds? No. Are helping signals relevant? No.
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8190
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden


Return to Active Lateral Thinking Puzzles

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 2 guests