[IrishElk] The Warriors

An archive of solved lateral thinking puzzles.

Moderators: peter365, Balin, kalira, JenBurdoo, Tiger

[IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby irishelk » Mon Nov 26, 2018 3:32 pm

They watched her carry out her plan to sabotage them, remarking that it was absolutely beautiful.
Last edited by irishelk on Tue Dec 25, 2018 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
irishelk
 
Posts: 1880
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Washington DC-ish

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby JenBurdoo » Mon Nov 26, 2018 4:08 pm

Were they "admiring the abomination?" ("It's just bitten off my fingers, look at those beautiful teeth!")

Did they stop the plan in its final stages, or intend to?

Was what she was doing against the law? A military activity? Was she an enemy?

Is this a simulation?

Is a particular group known for its warrior traditions relevant (Maori, etc)?
JenBurdoo
 
Posts: 1727
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 11:12 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby irishelk » Mon Nov 26, 2018 8:17 pm

JenBurdoo » Mon Nov 26, 2018 4:08 pm

Were they "admiring the abomination?" ("It's just bitten off my fingers, look at those beautiful teeth!") No, but I like the phrase. =)

Did they stop the plan in its final stages, or intend to? No.

Was what she was doing against the law? No. A military activity? No. Was she an enemy? Yes.

Is this a simulation? No.

Is a particular group known for its warrior traditions relevant (Maori, etc)? No.
User avatar
irishelk
 
Posts: 1880
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Washington DC-ish

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby WiZ » Mon Nov 26, 2018 8:28 pm

Does this happen in a military context? Business? Politics? A competition? Science relevant? The arts?
User avatar
WiZ
 
Posts: 2778
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 8:19 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby GalFisk » Tue Nov 27, 2018 8:12 am

Is the sabotage successful? Is her plan beautiful? Is she? Sports relevant? War? Espionage? Competition? Did she know they watched her?
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8882
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby irishelk » Fri Nov 30, 2018 1:37 pm

WiZ

Does this happen in a military context? No. Business? Yes. Politics? No. A competition? No. Science relevant? To the situation in general, yes. The arts? DOYD, but I'll say no.


GalFisk

Is the sabotage successful? Yes. Is her plan beautiful? Yes. Is she? Irr. Sports relevant? War? Espionage? Competition? No to all. Did she know they watched her? Yes, irr.
User avatar
irishelk
 
Posts: 1880
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Washington DC-ish

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby GalFisk » Sat Dec 01, 2018 9:29 pm

Could they have stopped her? Did they want to stop her? Did the execution of the plan take seconds? Minutes? Hours? Days? Weeks? Months? Years? Did she cause them financial loss? Prevent financial success? Were they doing something against the law?
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8882
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby Earnest » Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:48 am

Did she want to sabotage the firm or was it sometgibg that haopened randomly? Are we talking about modern times?

Is ethical hacking involved? Something similar? Something like the firm challenged hackers (people) to discover its weak points in order to correct them at the end (e.g. Facebook challenging hackers to acquire inf of their customers in order to see the process and correct it)?

Beautiful = beautifully conceived/organized? That involved someone (she herself) considered beautiful? Beautiful refers to an aesthetic aspect of the plan?

Sabotage = discover weak poibts of the business? Of a product? Proof that a product is dangerous? Stealing clients?
Earnest
 
Posts: 2199
Joined: Tue May 30, 2017 7:52 am

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby irishelk » Wed Dec 05, 2018 2:57 pm

GalFisk

Could they have stopped her? Possibly. Did they want to stop her? Hard to answer, yope. Did the execution of the plan take seconds? Minutes? Hours? Days? Weeks? Months? At least this.Years? Did she cause them financial loss? Yes. Prevent financial success? Yes. Were they doing something against the law? No.


Earnest

Did she want to sabotage the firm Yes. or was it sometgibg that haopened randomly? No. Are we talking about modern times? Yes.

Is ethical hacking involved? Something similar? Something like the firm challenged hackers (people) to discover its weak points in order to correct them at the end (e.g. Facebook challenging hackers to acquire inf of their customers in order to see the process and correct it)? No to all.

Beautiful = beautifully conceived/organized? No. That involved someone (she herself) considered beautiful? No. Beautiful refers to an aesthetic aspect of the plan? Yes.

Sabotage = discover weak poibts of the business? No. Of a product? Noish. Proof that a product is dangerous? Yope. Stealing clients? No.
User avatar
irishelk
 
Posts: 1880
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Washington DC-ish

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby GalFisk » Fri Dec 07, 2018 5:15 pm

Are they selling a product? A service? Is she a competitor? A customer of theirs? An employee? A former employee? Is she punished for her deeds? Do they want the sabotage to succeed? Will they be better off if she succeeds? Do they want the company to fail? Do they not care much whether she succeeds? Will they learn something relevant from what she did? Would they be displeased if the failed? Gave up?
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8882
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby Earnest » Sat Dec 08, 2018 7:32 am

Did it take months because: the plan was complicated? She waited until something happened(e.g. the firm exits the product)? She was alone in completing the plan? It took time for a chemical/natural event to happen? It took time for the product to show up the side effects? (E.g. she needed to repeat eating to Mc Donalds in order to prove that it was dangerous. Though there is nothing beautiful in here I suppose)

Is she causing losses by providing an alternative to the product? By proving they were doing something dangerous/wrong? By proving they had to pay a tax/fine? Internet relevant? Technology? Food? Sport? House appliances?

To be sure: they watch her = they know she was conducting a plan against them and they were able to see her doing it? Every day for all the months? They watch her without the possibility of preventing her from conducting the plan? Did she record a video?

Did the plan consist in repeating the same thing every day for months? Discover something? Use a product every day? Make tests on a prod? Make experiments on a product in a lab?
Earnest
 
Posts: 2199
Joined: Tue May 30, 2017 7:52 am

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby irishelk » Sat Dec 08, 2018 2:18 pm

GalFisk

Are they selling a product? Yes. A service? Just the production of the product.
Is she a competitor? A customer of theirs? An employee? A former employee? No to all.
Is she punished for her deeds? Irr. Do they want the sabotage to succeed? No to noish, FA lurking. Will they be better off if she succeeds? No. Do they want the company to fail? No. Do they not care much whether she succeeds? At the point that they are remarking on the beauty, this is correct. Will they learn something relevant from what she did? Yes. Would they be displeased if the failed? Gave up? No.


Earnest

Did it take months because: the plan was complicated? Not really. She waited until something happened(e.g. the firm exits the product)? Yes. She was alone in completing the plan? She was, but irr to the timing. It took time for a chemical/natural event to happen? In part, yes. It took time for the product to show up the side effects? YES. (E.g. she needed to repeat eating to Mc Donalds in order to prove that it was dangerous. Though there is nothing beautiful in here I suppose) But not quite like this.

Is she causing losses by providing an alternative to the product? No. By proving they were doing something dangerous/wrong? Yope. By proving they had to pay a tax/fine? No.
Internet relevant? Technology? Food? This, no to rest. Sport? House appliances?

To be sure: they watch her = they know she was conducting a plan against them and they were able to see her doing it? No, good question. Every day for all the months? They could see her every day, but probably didn't. They watch her without the possibility of preventing her from conducting the plan? Noish. Did she record a video? No.

Did the plan consist in repeating the same thing every day for months? Discover something? Use a product every day? Make tests on a prod? Make experiments on a product in a lab? No to all.
User avatar
irishelk
 
Posts: 1880
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Washington DC-ish

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby Earnest » Sat Dec 08, 2018 4:31 pm

Were the side effects on her skin? On someone else? On animals? Is environment relevant? Pollution? Chemicals in food? Food = junk food? Fast food? Fruit? Vegetables? Is the food here meant as final product? If so is the sabotage on the final product or on the raw material (food?) used to product the final product? Restaurant relevants? Food delivery? Packaging? Food quality? Can the food be found in supermarkets? Does it show up side effects when eaten? Does it show up side effects if taken in hige quantities? Proteic bars relevant?

Does the adjective beautiful refer to the product? To colors? Colors showing up after the side effect had appeared? Others?
Earnest
 
Posts: 2199
Joined: Tue May 30, 2017 7:52 am

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby irishelk » Sun Dec 09, 2018 1:19 pm

Earnest

Were the side effects on her skin? No. On someone else? Yes. On animals? Noish, but explore. Is environment relevant? In a sense. Pollution? No. Chemicals in food? Technically yes, but don't be thrown off.
Food = junk food? Fast food? Fruit? Vegetables? No to all. Is the food here meant as final product? It is sold as a product but is often incorporated into other foods. If so is the sabotage on the final product or on the raw material (food?) used to product the final product? The direct sabotage is on the raw material.
Restaurant relevants? Food delivery? Packaging? Food quality? No to all. Can the food be found in supermarkets? Yes.Does it show up side effects when eaten? Yes.Does it show up side effects if taken in hige quantities? I would imagine more so, yes.Proteic bars relevant? No.

Does the adjective beautiful refer to the product? No. To colors? To something colorful. Colors showing up after the side effect had appeared? No. Others?
User avatar
irishelk
 
Posts: 1880
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Washington DC-ish

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby GalFisk » Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:16 pm

Meat relevant? Food coloring? Does she provide them with a raw material? With something else?
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8882
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby Earnest » Mon Dec 10, 2018 8:12 am

Is the raw material "animals" (it is here said in a bad way but just in order to clarify my previous questions)?
Feeding animals relevant? Is she a farmer? Is milk relevant? Cheese? If animals relevant: Chicken? Cows? Rabbits? Pigs? Fishes? Others?
Something colorful = the raw material? The food? The product after side effects?

Is pasta relevant? Flour? Cereals? Pizza?

Relevant which kind of side effects the product would have given? Physical problems? Side effects showing up colors? Burning relevant?

WAG --> did the firm sell food for animals and she proved that, if animals had eaten that kind of food, the quality of the product sold by supermarket (among others) would decrease?
Earnest
 
Posts: 2199
Joined: Tue May 30, 2017 7:52 am

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby irishelk » Mon Dec 10, 2018 11:07 pm

GalFisk

Meat relevant? No. Food coloring? No. Does she provide them with a raw material? Yesish--sort of indirectly. With something else? No.


Earnest

Is the raw material "animals" (it is here said in a bad way but just in order to clarify my previous questions)? No.
Feeding animals relevant? Yes! Is she a farmer? No. Is milk relevant? Cheese? No.
If animals relevant: Chicken? Cows? Rabbits? Pigs? Fishes? Others? This.
Something colorful = the raw material? Yes. The food? No. The product after side effects? No.

Is pasta relevant? Flour? Cereals? Pizza? No to all.

Relevant which kind of side effects the product would have given? Yes, or at least might help you. Physical problems? Yes. Side effects showing up colors? No. Burning relevant? No.

WAG --> did the firm sell food for animals and she proved that, if animals had eaten that kind of food, the quality of the product sold by supermarket (among others) would decrease? No, but OTRT.
User avatar
irishelk
 
Posts: 1880
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Washington DC-ish

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby Earnest » Tue Dec 11, 2018 7:58 am

Feeding animals with other animals? Herbivores?
Can the animal to be fed be found in a farm? Into the wild? Is mainly the meat of those animals that can be found as a final product to consumer in supermarkets? Or is it something produced by that animal? Just a part of the animal?

Is the animal a mammal? A bird?

To be sure...is the final product the food for animal? For cats? For dogs? Did she work in a kennel?
Earnest
 
Posts: 2199
Joined: Tue May 30, 2017 7:52 am

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby irishelk » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:30 pm

Earnest

Feeding animals with other animals? No. Herbivores? The animals in question are, yes.
Can the animal to be fed be found in a farm? Yes. In the wild? Yes. Is mainly the meat of those animals that can be found as a final product to consumer in supermarkets? No. Or is it something produced by that animal? Yes. Just a part of the animal? No.

Is the animal a mammal? A bird? Neither.

To be sure...is the final product the food for animal? For cats? For dogs? Did she work in a kennel? No to rest.
User avatar
irishelk
 
Posts: 1880
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Washington DC-ish

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby GalFisk » Wed Dec 12, 2018 3:30 pm

Insects relevant? Honey? Fish? Caviar?
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8882
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby irishelk » Sat Dec 15, 2018 10:02 pm

GalFisk

Insects relevant? Yes. Honey? Yes! Fish? Caviar? No to rest.
User avatar
irishelk
 
Posts: 1880
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Washington DC-ish

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby GalFisk » Sun Dec 16, 2018 10:48 am

Does she feed the bees? Does she sabotage the honey? Does she make it unfit for human consumption? Unappealing? Does she sow or plant certain species of flowers? Are they saying that flowers are beautiful?
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8882
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby irishelk » Sun Dec 16, 2018 2:11 pm

GalFisk

Does she feed the bees? Yes. Does she sabotage the honey? Yes. Does she make it unfit for human consumption? Yesish. Unappealing? Yope. Does she sow or plant certain species of flowers? Yes. Are they saying that flowers are beautiful? Yes!
User avatar
irishelk
 
Posts: 1880
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Washington DC-ish

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby Balin » Sun Dec 16, 2018 2:24 pm

Does the bees' pollination of this particular type of flower cause their honey to be inedible (or unsafe to eat, or unwise to eat)?
Balin
 
Posts: 7393
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 11:12 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby GalFisk » Sun Dec 16, 2018 7:32 pm

Do the flowers change the color of the honey? The taste? The consistency? The chemical makeup? The legal status? The trademark status? Some certification? Did they know the flowers sabotaged the honey? Was the honey still fine for the bees? Is she an animal rights activist? Relevant why she's doing this?
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8882
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby irishelk » Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:22 pm

Balin

Does the bees' pollination of this particular type of flower cause their honey to be inedible (or unsafe to eat, or unwise to eat)? Yes indeed. Technically edible, but not a good idea.


GalFisk

Do the flowers change the color of the honey? The taste? The consistency? Not that I know of. The chemical makeup? Yes. The legal status? The trademark status? Some certification? No to rest.
Did they know the flowers sabotaged the honey? Yes. Was the honey still fine for the bees? Yes. Is she an animal rights activist? No. Relevant why she's doing this? It should help put everything together.

Googling allowed at this point.
User avatar
irishelk
 
Posts: 1880
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Washington DC-ish

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby GalFisk » Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:57 pm

Does it make the honey toxic to humans? To certain humans? Such as those allergic to something specific? Are the flowers toxic to humans? Is she a rival beekeeper? Does she want the bees to be removed from the area? Is she allergic to bees? Annoyed by bees? Annoyed at the beekeepers?
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8882
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby KayleeArafinwiel » Fri Dec 21, 2018 2:20 am

Bitter honey relevant? Hybrid bees? Killer bees?
KayleeArafinwiel
 
Posts: 465
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 5:11 pm

Re: [IrishElk] The Warriors

Postby irishelk » Tue Dec 25, 2018 2:19 pm

GalFisk

Does it make the honey toxic to humans? Yes. To certain humans? Such as those allergic to something specific?
Are the flowers toxic to humans? I believe so. Is she a rival beekeeper? No. Does she want the bees to be removed from the area? Yes. Is she allergic to bees? Annoyed by bees? Yes! I think that's about it! Annoyed at the beekeepers?


************************SPOILER

Our Villain is annoyed that her neighbors, without consulting her, started an apiary in their backyard to sell honey. Now, she has bees buzzing in and out of her house, all day everyday, and is fed up with it. She knows she could be sued for killing their bees, so instead she starts planting massive amounts of rhododendron in her backyard. The neighbors even remark on how pretty the flowers are!

Nectar from rhododendron creates "mad honey," a toxic honey that, when consumed, can cause severe physical illness as well as hallucinations and neurological impairments. Not good news. After it becomes known that these artisan beekeepers are selling tainted honey, they quickly go out of business. They can't even sue, because ultimately it was on them to make sure that their bees weren't ingesting anything toxic.

The perfect evil plan!
User avatar
irishelk
 
Posts: 1880
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Washington DC-ish


Return to Solved Lateral Thinking Puzzles

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests