[IrishElk] Room For One More

Current and recently solved lateral thinking puzzles. Please post new lateral thinking puzzles here.

Moderators: peter365, Balin, kalira, JenBurdoo, Tiger

[IrishElk] Room For One More

Postby irishelk » Tue Jan 01, 2019 3:31 pm

Rose successfully pulls off a scheme that she is certain will shock her employer. But she is the one who ends up shocked, while the employer is not surprised at all.
User avatar
irishelk
 
Posts: 1808
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Washington DC-ish

Re: [IrishElk] Room For One More

Postby Earnest » Tue Jan 01, 2019 4:51 pm

Rose = HAF? Scheme = a set of moves? A strategy? A summary of ideas? A painted scheme? Was the scheme written? Printed? Scheme = a plot? A plan? Something related to her work?

she is certain will shock her employer = because it was innovative? It proposed a solution never explored before? Did she expect her employer to be proud of her? To be happy? Was the scheme intended to: solve a problem? Gain more? Extinguish competitors? Better a product? Invent a new one? Face financial difficulties? Did the employer required her to pull off a scheme?

Did she end up shocked because something went "out of the scheme"? Something unexpected happened? The employer made her notice something she did not notice before? The employer had already pulled off the scheme? The same one? Another one? Someone else already pulled off a better scheme? She did not know something that instead the employer did?,

Relevant her work? Is food relevant? Clothing? Hotels? Restaurants? Banks? Cars? Planes? Music? Entertainment? Cinema? Technology? Internet? Does the firm provide services? Sell products?
Earnest
 
Posts: 2040
Joined: Tue May 30, 2017 7:52 am

Re: [IrishElk] Room For One More

Postby KayleeArafinwiel » Thu Jan 03, 2019 4:59 pm

True story? FYOI? FSEI?

Is Rose her real name? Or if this is a character she is playing, is Rose her character's real name? Is Rose from St. Olaf, Minnesota?

Is Rose the sort of person who thinks up outlandish schemes on a regular basis? Does she have a habit of coming up with statements those around her (friends/roommates? colleagues?) think are rather foolish?

I have no idea what scheme this is or may be, but when I saw the puzzle statement I could think of only one possible Rose, and even if I'm wrong I'll be interested to see where this goes, lol.
KayleeArafinwiel
 
Posts: 465
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 5:11 pm

Re: [IrishElk] Room For One More

Postby gregoryuconn » Fri Jan 04, 2019 12:40 am

Her employer = her direct supervisor? Her team? Her whole company? Relevant what industry she works in? Was this a good shock? Or a bad shock? Or is some meaning of "shock" other than "astonish" relevant, like economic shock or electrocution?
gregoryuconn
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Northern Virginia, USA

Re: [IrishElk] Room For One More

Postby irishelk » Fri Jan 04, 2019 1:44 pm

Earnest

Rose = HAF? Yes. Scheme = a set of moves? Yes. A strategy? A summary of ideas? A painted scheme? Was the scheme written? Printed? Scheme = a plot? A plan? Or this. Something related to her work? Yes.

she is certain will shock her employer = because it was innovative? No. It proposed a solution never explored before? No. Did she expect her employer to be proud of her? No. To be happy? No. Was the scheme intended to: solve a problem? Gain more? Extinguish competitors? Better a product? Invent a new one? Face financial difficulties? Not really any of these. Did the employer required her to pull off a scheme? No.

Did she end up shocked because something went "out of the scheme"? Not really... Something unexpected happened? But yes. The employer made her notice something she did not notice before? Yes, Notice or realize. The employer had already pulled off the scheme? The same one? Another one? Someone else already pulled off a better scheme? No to these--the employer had done something relevant, but I wouldn't call it a "scheme." She did not know something that instead the employer did?, Yes.

Relevant her work? Yes. Is food relevant? Clothing? Hotels? Restaurants? Banks? Cars? Planes? Music? Entertainment? Cinema? Technology? Internet? No to all! Does the firm provide services? Sell products? No, FA.


KayleeArafinwiel

True story? FYOI? This, very possible that it's happened before. FSEI?

Is Rose her real name? Yes. Or if this is a character she is playing, is Rose her character's real name? Is Rose from St. Olaf, Minnesota? Haha, not that Rose.

Is Rose the sort of person who thinks up outlandish schemes on a regular basis? Irr. Does she have a habit of coming up with statements those around her (friends/roommates? colleagues?) think are rather foolish? Irr.

I have no idea what scheme this is or may be, but when I saw the puzzle statement I could think of only one possible Rose, and even if I'm wrong I'll be interested to see where this goes, lol. Lol! Not Betty White, unfortunately, but actually a little bit OTRT.


gregoryuconn

Her employer = her direct supervisor? Technically, yes, but neither would think of the relationship this way. Her team? No. Her whole company? No/FA. Relevant what industry she works in? Yes. Was this a good shock? Or a bad shock? The planned one--bad. The actual one--could be either. Or is some meaning of "shock" other than "astonish" relevant, like economic shock or electrocution? "Astonish" is correct.
User avatar
irishelk
 
Posts: 1808
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Washington DC-ish

Re: [IrishElk] Room For One More

Postby GalFisk » Thu Jan 10, 2019 2:24 pm

Did she plan to do this at work? At home? Somewhere else? Did she intend for her employer to find out what she did? Was anyone else involved in pulling off her plan? Could anyone be said to be a victim of her actions? Had the employer anticipated that someone might do what she wanted to do?
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8508
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [IrishElk] Room For One More

Postby irishelk » Fri Jan 11, 2019 2:31 pm

GalFisk

Did she plan to do this at work? Partially. At home? Noish. Somewhere else? Yes. Did she intend for her employer to find out what she did? Yes. Was anyone else involved in pulling off her plan? Someone else relevant, but not a co-conspirator. Could anyone be said to be a victim of her actions? Debatable, but I'd say yes. Had the employer anticipated that someone might do what she wanted to do? No or irr.
User avatar
irishelk
 
Posts: 1808
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Washington DC-ish

Re: [IrishElk] Room For One More

Postby JenBurdoo » Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:33 pm

Was she planning to trick the other relevant person? Anyone else?

Was the scheme to be pulled off over email? in person? snail mail? telephone?

Would the scheme take a significant amount of time to prepare or execute? Seconds/minutes/hours/days/more?

Would there be a financial loss involved? Or was the scheme humorous in nature, such as a practical joke?
JenBurdoo
 
Posts: 1729
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 11:12 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Re: [IrishElk] Room For One More

Postby irishelk » Sat Jan 26, 2019 3:02 pm

JenBurdoo

Was she planning to trick the other relevant person? Yes, probably necessary to trick or at least deceive this person. Anyone else? No.

Was the scheme to be pulled off over email? in person? This is involved. snail mail? And this, in a minor way. telephone?

Would the scheme take a significant amount of time to prepare or execute? Yes. Seconds/minutes/hours/days/more? I'd imagine more than a week to complete.

Would there be a financial loss involved? No. Or was the scheme humorous in nature, such as a practical joke? No.
User avatar
irishelk
 
Posts: 1808
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Washington DC-ish

Re: [IrishElk] Room For One More

Postby GalFisk » Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:03 am

Is the scheme illegal? Is she employed by a company? A person? Is she doing this to benefit her employer? Herself? Is she doing it as part of her profession? Part of her job ?
GalFisk
 
Posts: 8508
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 8:03 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: [IrishElk] Room For One More

Postby irishelk » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:20 pm

GalFisk

Is the scheme illegal? Yes it is. Is she employed by a company? No. A person? Yesish, good question, explore! Is she doing this to benefit her employer? She thinks so. Herself? Not directly. Is she doing it as part of her profession? Part of her job ? No to both.
User avatar
irishelk
 
Posts: 1808
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Washington DC-ish

Re: [IrishElk] Room For One More

Postby CoffeeBean » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:28 pm

Is the nature of Rose's job relevant? Is she self employed? A part-time worker? A contract worker? An agent?
Does her plan involve financial manipulation? Fraud? Tax evasion?
CoffeeBean
 
Posts: 1039
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 6:34 pm

Re: [IrishElk] Room For One More

Postby irishelk » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:40 pm

CoffeeBean

Is the nature of Rose's job relevant? Yes. Is she self employed? Yes. A part-time worker? Yes. A contract worker? There is likely no formal contract, but in the sense that she is not a regular employee, yes. An agent? No.
Does her plan involve financial manipulation? Fraud? Tax evasion? No to all.
User avatar
irishelk
 
Posts: 1808
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:25 am
Location: Washington DC-ish

Re: [IrishElk] Room For One More

Postby Hobbsicle » Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:22 am

Is her actual line of work illegal? Or only the scheme itself? Does she work in the employer's home? Is the other relevant person related to either one of them?

Is she expecting the scheme to at some point be revealed? Or is her intent to always keep it secret? Does she believe it will benefit the employer financially? Emotionally? Relationally? Physically?
Hobbsicle
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 11:42 am
Location: Texas, United States

Re: [IrishElk] Room For One More

Postby Earnest » Tue Feb 19, 2019 7:34 am

Did she want to explain the scheme to the employer?
Just complete it and presenting the results to the boss? Publishing reserved documents/conversations relevant?
Is rose the only one employee of the employer? Is she the first one? The employer was not surprised at all because: it already happened? He noticed Rose pulling off the plan? He noticed something that let him think she will? He already did what Rose planned? He already figured out what Rose was planning? Are accounting books relevant? Did the plan involve customers? Is Rose working in health care? As an apprendist? By a dentist? (E.g. she planned to substitute a golden teeth with a fake one and keep the gold) Is anesthesia relevant? Does she work as a baby sitter? As cleaning lady? Touring guide? Scientist? Researcher at university?

Does the plan involve: data manipulation? illegal manipulation of money? Illegal substances? Alchol? Illegal transactions? Compromising conversations? Theft? Privacy violation (checking the habits of someone)? A damage to a costumer? Taking advantage of the possibilities that her job position gives her (e.g. having the keys of someone's house; a password? Keys of a car?)? Is she employed in a spa?

Any device relevant? Pc? Phone? Cars?
Part time job: has she got turns? Did she work during night? Afternoon? Evening? Relevant? Is it a pub?

Did Rose ended up being shocked in a positive way? In a negative way? Was she fired? Is the employer an undercover cop? Did she end up being arrested? Are other cultures relevant? Muslims? Japanese geishas?
Earnest
 
Posts: 2040
Joined: Tue May 30, 2017 7:52 am


Return to Active Lateral Thinking Puzzles

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], hoodie and 5 guests