by JenBurdoo » Fri Oct 04, 2019 8:11 pm
Do his actions let the enemy know where his superiors are? Yes. Do they make sure his superiors are in a certain location? No. Is the fish prepared for other members of the military? For prisoners? Irr, but this is closest. Is he employed as a cook? Yes. Is the fish used as a signal? No. Does the grenade do anything except kill fish? No. Does he relevantly get access to explosives for fishing? Yes. Does he set off the explosion that kills the men? No. Are they officers? Irr. Are they hit by a rocket? No. Is the explosive dropped from the air? This. Launched by a gun? Placed by hand? Shipped? Launched into or under water? Buried? Strapped to an animal? None of the others. When blown up, are they indoors? Outdoors? Either. In a vehicle? A bunker? Possibly, irr. Byproducts from preparing the fish relevant? No. Is the man sending a signal? Yes.
When you say he's an infiltrator, do you mean that he's snuck behind Axis lines without them knowing? Yes. That he's put himself in the middle of Axis military people and is passing himself off as one of them? For SVV of "them." I'm not clear on the distinction between infiltrator and spy, I guess. Normally, an infiltrator is still in uniform and acting as a soldier, rather than passing himself off as the enemy. It's arguable, but in this case, he is doing his normal military job.
Does he do something that gives away his own position to the enemy? Yes. Is he instructed to prepare fish for the enemies? Yes. Prepare as in cook? Yes. Get them ready for use in another fashion? Is relevant... (I think I've heard of fish being fashioned into lanterns, etc.) But he's not being artistic, and is still preparing them to be eaten.