EarnestTo be sure...does transitivity hold? I mean...relationship goes from divorce to anonimity and from anonimity to speeding ticket in Finland. Does it mean also that there is a direct relationship divorce --> speeding ticket?
no to allIs shared income when married relevant?
yes If so does it make the difference in Finland when having to pay a speeding ticket?
no (I think) Are points on driving license relevant?
no Relevant, in a couple, who is fined for having broken speeding rules?
no Is anonimity relevant when paying fines?
no Insurance relevant?
no Being fined for more times relevant?
no Can people in Finland pay fines anonimously? (E.g. to pay less in insurance terms)
If so, it isn't relevant Is anonimity here meant as "not accounting for the speeding fine when paying insurance"? Or maybe are pictures of speed camera relevant? Face of the driver? License plate? Others?
no, it is far broader than all thatAnonimity on social media?
yes, among other things On a particular social media? Phone calls in anonymous mode (e.g. hidden number)?
no to these Sentimental status on social media relevant?
This is a factor, but not a huge one Official statistics on marriages?
noPictures = pictures on social media?
yes, among others Selfie? Pictures of animals?
no to both Of coiples?
yope Other?
yesAnonimity = more money?
no A long lasting relationship with respect to someone else (e.g. people keep posting pictures in couple?)?
this is a factorPeterAre gag orders relevent?
they are potentially a factor Is the notion that being wealthy means you can afford to remain anonymous if you've done something wrong relevant?
This kind of thinking is relevant, yes - but not your exact exampleGalFiskCollecting lottery winnings relevant?
no IIRC somewhere in the world you have to collect them in person, but you can come masked, so big winners disguise themselves thoroughly. Relevant?
noNot sure if this hint is entirely kosher, but the solution I had in mind consists of about 10 words 