by Balin » Sat Jun 13, 2020 12:09 pm
A woman=she? Yes
Is the one thing the same type of thing as the two things? Yes Is it one of the two? [bNo[/b]
Assuming woman = she.
Is money involved? Not directly Transactions? but Yes, tangentially E.g. she had pieces of , 2,3,4,5 of a currency ($?) and had to pay 6 to a vending machine not giving change. Since the only ways of making 6 are 3+3, 5+1 or 4+2, but the former combinations were impossible with her amounts, while the latter combination could be done without losing the 2, she preferred to pay 7 (4+3). Nothing like this, though
If currency/money is involved, could she change her money somehow? Irrel
Was losing one the only way to avoid losing 2? Not necessarily Would the lost of 2 economically more expensive than the lost of 1? Yes, I believe so Vice versa? so No I mean, had 1 and 2 the same face value? No The same value for her? Yes (not economic value, though) Did they have a price? Yes Was she forced to lose one or two? No Is betting relevant? No Are body parts relevant? No Are the lost subsequents(i.e. she preferred to lose one nmtoday not to lose two at the same time? Or maybe there is a delay in time, e.g. she preferred not to lose one today in order not to lose two in years from now?) There is no set time when she would lose two - it could be days or months E.g. she preferred to lose a kidney today in irder not to lose both (and life) in two years? No
Are the one and two substiute one to another? Not quite sure what you mean Could they be easily replaced/rebought/regained by her? Yes, but it would be a chunk of change
Did she know she might lose one? Yes Did she successfully avoid losing two? Yes Could she get another one? Yes Did she have two to lose? Yes More? Less? Exactly two